Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday June 22 2015, @05:41PM   Printer-friendly
from the your-method-needs-an-upgrade dept.

El Reg reports

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has pushed out its fifth annual "Who Has Your Back" report, claiming to chart tech companies' commitment to "the next frontier of user privacy".

The EFF's categorisation of what constitutes effective privacy standards for data controllers has seen it award full marks to Apple, Yahoo, and Dropbox, among others, in its 2015 report, telling netizens who has or does not have their back, or backs.

The "digital rights" lobbying group evaluated 24 companies--not on whether they shared data with commercial partners, or whether they snooped on users' devices and trafficked that data back to their own labs--but instead on the five categories we have included below.

  • Follows industry-accepted best practices
  • Tells users about government data demands
  • Discloses policies on data retention
  • Discloses government content removal requests
  • Pro-user public policy opposes backdoors

Responding to The Register's questions regarding the widespread criticism of many of these companies true commitment to customers' privacy, Nate Cardozo, an EFF Staff Attorney, told us that "with this report, we ask specifically how well companies stand up to the government, not what kind of business they run. In fact, there's likely room for an entirely different report that looks at how much data companies collect, retain, and share. We may produce such a report in the future, but it wouldn't be a part of Who Has Your Back."

[...]Particularly interesting are the full marks for Dropbox, a PRISM target "partner" according to Snowden documents released earlier this month.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Nerdfest on Monday June 22 2015, @08:34PM

    by Nerdfest (80) on Monday June 22 2015, @08:34PM (#199575)

    Hey, what the hell happened to Google. Last year (I think) they were full marks (Apple wasn't). I'm not sure about retention policies, but they were pretty much the first to disclose government data requests.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Tuesday June 23 2015, @06:51PM

    by Freeman (732) on Tuesday June 23 2015, @06:51PM (#200030) Journal

    Apple paid the EFF more this year.

    --
    Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
    • (Score: 2) by Nerdfest on Tuesday June 23 2015, @08:18PM

      by Nerdfest (80) on Tuesday June 23 2015, @08:18PM (#200076)

      Perhaps. I hope not, as I support the EFF (financially and otherwise) and that would pretty much condemn them. As it is, they're one of the few organizations doing good work for privacy, fairness and openness at the moment.