Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Monday June 22 2015, @10:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the survival-of-the-fittest dept.

Updated June 21, 1720 EST (2220 BST): AMD Spokesperson Sarah Youngbauer issued a statement over the weekend denying Reuters' report. She wrote, "AMD provided official confirmation that we have not hired an outside agency to explore spinning-off/splitting the company... We remain committed to the long-term strategy we laid out for the company in May at our Financial Analyst Day, which encompasses all parts of the business."
Original story

On Friday afternoon, Reuters reported that AMD is weighing its options, and those options include breaking the company up or spinning off some sectors into independent companies. Three anonymous sources who are "familiar with the matter" told the newswire that AMD is just looking at a break up preliminarily, noting that the company hasn't made any decisions to go forward with the move.

Remember when AMD could compete with Intel in both speed and price?
Reuters' sources had said that AMD has hired a consulting firm, "to help it review its options and draw up scenarios on how a break-up or spin-off would work."

AMD has struggled over the last decade to keep up with its hulking competitor, Intel. The company's most recent quarterly financial results in April were down 26 percent year on year, with revenue of $1.03 billion and increased operating losses. In addition, the company announced that it would be leaving the microserver market, essentially scrapping its 2012 acquisition of SeaMicro. Since stepping into the role, AMD's new CEO Lisa Su has been determined "to consider every possible option to turn the company around," according to Reuters, including breaking up the company.

"One option under consideration is separating AMD's graphics and licensing business from its server business, which sells processors that power data centers," an anonymous source said, while adding that nothing has been decided and the company could remain together after all.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Type44Q on Tuesday June 23 2015, @06:03PM

    by Type44Q (4347) on Tuesday June 23 2015, @06:03PM (#200007)

    Intel moved to the slot architecture to be able to fit a bigger heat sink on the package

    Intel moved from Socket7 to Slot1 for licensing reasons.

    By the way, fuck you, Dice!

  • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Thursday June 25 2015, @08:11AM

    by TheRaven (270) on Thursday June 25 2015, @08:11AM (#200839) Journal
    They moved from Socket 7 for licensing reasons. They moved to Slot 1 so that they could fit on massive heat sinks (and to lower the costs for the parts that had cache in a second package). Subsequent socket designs have had the same licensing issues as Slot 1, and with the Pentium 4 they figured out how to attach huge heatsinks in that configuration without damaging the chip.
    --
    sudo mod me up