Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Wednesday June 24 2015, @03:32AM   Printer-friendly
from the it-was-always-the-same-as-now dept.

In the past year, a conflict has erupted between technology companies, privacy advocates, and members of the U.S. law enforcement and intelligence communities over the right to use and distribute products that contain strong encryption technology.

This debate between government actors seeking ways to preserve access to encrypted communications and a coalition of pro-encryption groups is reminiscent of an old battle that played out in the 1990s: a period that has come to be known as the "Crypto Wars."

This paper tells the story of that debate and the lessons that are relevant to today. It is a story not only about policy responses to new technology, but also a sustained, coordinated effort among industry groups, privacy advocates, and technology experts from across the political spectrum to push back against government policies that threatened online innovation and fundamental human rights.

http://www.newamerica.org/oti/doomed-to-repeat-history-lessons-from-the-crypto-wars-of-the-1990s/

[Paper - PDF]: https://static.newamerica.org/attachments/3407-doomed-to-repeat-history-lessons-from-the-crypto-wars-of-the-1990s/OTI_Crypto_Wars_History.abe6caa19cbc40de842e01c28a028418.pdf

[Also Covered By]: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2015/06/history_of_the_.html


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by stormwyrm on Wednesday June 24 2015, @05:53AM

    by stormwyrm (717) on Wednesday June 24 2015, @05:53AM (#200244) Journal

    I'm old enough to remember the Crypto Wars and after reading all of it (it's 42 pages and nearly half is endnotes so it's not that long) I think I can say that the article's probably the best summary of the events and policy debates that took place back then that I have seen. The conclusion is, however, somewhat naïve:

    It seems like we may once again be on the verge of another war: a Crypto War 2.0. But it would be far wiser to maintain the peace than to begin a new and unnecessary conflict. We already had a robust public debate that resolved this dispute, and nothing has changed since the 1990s that would cast doubt on the policy conclusions we reached then; indeed, the post-war period has only reinforced those conclusions. Although there are numerous individual lessons from the Crypto Wars, the overarching takeaway is that weakening or otherwise undermining encryption is bad for our economy, our economic security, and our civil liberties — and there is no reason to repeat our previous mistakes.

    Very well said, but alas something has changed since the 1990s. Today, the US has a public that is so cowed by fear that they say to the FBI and the NSA, fall on us, and hide us from the wrath of the evil terrorists. It is harder to have reasoned public debate on this when the government is has an excuse to use Hermann Göring's famous aphorism: "All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger."

    These days I have to wonder if the United States still deserves the epithet: "land of the free and home of the brave." When they stopped being the latter they also ceased being the former.

    --
    Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Wednesday June 24 2015, @10:19AM

    by aristarchus (2645) on Wednesday June 24 2015, @10:19AM (#200311) Journal

    Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.

    Hey, look, it's some kind of code! At least I cannot understand it, so it must be code. Can any one break this code? (And before everyone goes bonkers, look up the "Windtalkers". Sometimes that is all it takes. Especially with Republicans.)

    • (Score: 2) by Kell on Wednesday June 24 2015, @11:45AM

      by Kell (292) on Wednesday June 24 2015, @11:45AM (#200333)

      It seems to be written in some strange dead language.

      --
      Scientists ask questions. Engineers solve problems.
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by shrewdsheep on Wednesday June 24 2015, @11:17AM

    by shrewdsheep (5215) on Wednesday June 24 2015, @11:17AM (#200326)

    And one more thing has changed. E-commerce and legally binding electronic communication is now integral to everyday life. These reliy on strong encryption and are international by now. So it is war-on-terror vs e-commerce and I believe that e-commerce will win (as in fear-mongering vs. deep pockets).