Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Wednesday June 24 2015, @03:32AM   Printer-friendly
from the it-was-always-the-same-as-now dept.

In the past year, a conflict has erupted between technology companies, privacy advocates, and members of the U.S. law enforcement and intelligence communities over the right to use and distribute products that contain strong encryption technology.

This debate between government actors seeking ways to preserve access to encrypted communications and a coalition of pro-encryption groups is reminiscent of an old battle that played out in the 1990s: a period that has come to be known as the "Crypto Wars."

This paper tells the story of that debate and the lessons that are relevant to today. It is a story not only about policy responses to new technology, but also a sustained, coordinated effort among industry groups, privacy advocates, and technology experts from across the political spectrum to push back against government policies that threatened online innovation and fundamental human rights.

http://www.newamerica.org/oti/doomed-to-repeat-history-lessons-from-the-crypto-wars-of-the-1990s/

[Paper - PDF]: https://static.newamerica.org/attachments/3407-doomed-to-repeat-history-lessons-from-the-crypto-wars-of-the-1990s/OTI_Crypto_Wars_History.abe6caa19cbc40de842e01c28a028418.pdf

[Also Covered By]: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2015/06/history_of_the_.html


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 24 2015, @06:49AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 24 2015, @06:49AM (#200263)
    Of course not: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." -- Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution
  • (Score: 2) by davester666 on Wednesday June 24 2015, @07:16AM

    by davester666 (155) on Wednesday June 24 2015, @07:16AM (#200272)

    I think the bit flipped.

    Now it seems to be 'all rights not explicitly given to people are implicitly retained by the gov't'.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 24 2015, @07:36AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 24 2015, @07:36AM (#200274)
      That I can't disagree with. They've been using the Constitution as toilet paper for a long time, but since Bush II they've been using it to really wipe their asses. Obama hasn't changed this trend one iota.