Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Wednesday June 24 2015, @02:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the he-hasn't-been-right-yet dept.

A professor famous for predicting the imminent demise of the human race at regular intervals since the 1970s has predicted the imminent demise of the human race.

Paul Ehrlich, who is the Bing Professor of Population Studies at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment, says it's definitely on this time. In a tinned statement issued on Friday, the arm-waving prof lays it on the line:

There is no longer any doubt: We are entering a mass extinction that threatens humanity's existence ... the window of opportunity is rapidly closing ...

"[The study] shows without any significant doubt that we are now entering the sixth great mass extinction event," Ehrlich said ...

"If it is allowed to continue, life would take many millions of years to recover, and our species itself would likely disappear early on," said lead author Gerardo Ceballos.

The original article can be found at The Register, with coverage of the cited study coming from ScienceMag.org


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 24 2015, @05:26PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 24 2015, @05:26PM (#200477)

    So naturally we should not do anything and wait for collapse. THEN we'll start listening to him because he was proven correct.

    We should not listen to the structural engineer when he tells us that the bridge supports are cracked and need to be replaced lest the bridge collapses. Where has he actually predicted a bridge collapse and it happened? Bah! We'll wait until one of his collapses occurs, then we'll know he's not a crank. Until then, he just tries to conflate and confuse us with all that "engineer-y" mumbo jumbo.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Touché=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 24 2015, @05:35PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 24 2015, @05:35PM (#200483)

    I would only listen to an engineer who had previously predicted otherwise unexpected collapses or built bridges that did not collapse. It sounds like you would listen to the guy screaming it on the street corner. How do YOU determine who is credible?