Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday June 26 2015, @11:38AM   Printer-friendly
from the privacy-fading-away-like-a-sunset dept.

ICANN is currently considering [pdf] new rules that will affect Privacy & Proxy services. Opponents claim this to be yet another effort by big business to bypass due process, as ICANN is being lobbied to make private registrations unlawful for "commercial" use. As it has been argued effectively in the courts that any website with advertisements is commercial in nature, opponents say this can strip private registrations from any personal website or blog that funds itself by ads. Proponents of new rule complain that P/P services are too often slow to respond, to respond at all, and determining the proper entity for legal action is too difficult. Proponents ask that personally identifiable information be disclosed upon written demand to ICANN, without a court order required, with only ICANN ostensibly determining if the written demand is correct, lawful for all parties, and suitable grounds for bypassing due process in the domain holder's country.

Namecheap.com, the EFF, and Fight For The Future currently have a campaign going to call and write into ICANN before the deadline for public comments, on July 7, 2015. Of course, you can call them directly (busy signal all day) at their LA offices - +1-310-301-5800 to make a comment, or email them directly at comments-ppsai-initial-05may15@icann.org and policy-staff@icann.org

ICANN is currently only seeking comment, and is unable to come to a consensus on this issue yet. Assuming ICANN does eliminate P/P for everyone, we are left with the Distortion part of Avoid-Distort-Block-Break.

How would Soylentils respond to the lack of private registrations?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Gravis on Saturday June 27 2015, @02:06AM

    by Gravis (4596) on Saturday June 27 2015, @02:06AM (#201947)

    Nowhere else is anyone demanded to publicly publish their real contact details and home addresses, and in nearly all cases, such information is protected by law, and disclosures are heavily regulated.

    that's not true at all. if you buy property, all that info is on file and publicly available. a domain name is like land, it's a finite resource that is bought and sold so i think the owners should also be publicly listed.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2