Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday June 27 2015, @10:56PM   Printer-friendly
from the brilliant-idea dept.

India might be short on many things, but sunlight isn't one of those, which makes the country a perfect place for solar power. There's starting to be some political support for the clean source of energy (India is currently very dependent on coal) up to the highest levels of government, with the new prime minister Narendra Modi wanting to use it as a way to bring power to the 400 million Indians who are currently lacking access to electricity. Modi … has set a goal of 100 gigawatts of solar capacity, which would be a big jump from the 4.1 gigawatts that are currently connected to the grid. At about $1 per watt, that is estimated to cost about $94 billion, a substantial sum in any country, and even more so in India.

But solar in India is also starting to attract the attention of businesspeople with deep pockets, like Japan's Masayoshi Son, the founder and CEO of SoftBank, a very large global telecommunication and technology company (with stakes in SoftBank Mobile in Japan, Sprint in the U.S., Alibaba in China, etc). He is said to want to invest $20 billion over the next 10 years, working with Bharti Enterprises Pvt and Foxconn Technology Group, to build about 20 gigawatts of new solar capacity in the country. This investment alone could represent about 1/5 of Modi's solar target.

India has two times more sunshine than Japan and construction costs for solar parks that are half those of Japan, Son said. "Twice the sunshine, half the cost; that means four times more efficient," Son said. "So it makes a lot of sense to create large-scale solar power generation."

The solar panels will probably be manufactured in India, and sites in Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh states are being considered.

Price per installed watt of solar has been falling sharply for the last 10 years. Projects of this scale will accelerate that. Time to short coal stocks?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Sunday June 28 2015, @11:49AM

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Sunday June 28 2015, @11:49AM (#202402) Homepage
    > No one really gives a fuck about the environmental harms -- Virtually everyone that says otherwise still buys dirty energy rather than doing without "unclean" power.

    I voluntarily pay an extra high "Green" tarriff for my electricity (which is my only possible source of energy) purely voluntarily. My provider is pushing towards more provision of green energy, and whilst I know more than 50% of my electrons are from dirty original sources rather than clean ones, at least I'm helping justify keeping the green ones active, and the R&D into expanding them. So not everyone fails to put their money where their mouth is.

    And I too would dearly like to see muchos dollars invested into a nuclear future - in particular in making Thorium practical for metro-scale use. It clearly works in the small scale. (Actually, I'd like to see muchos euros invested in it. I'd only be too happy if Europe could take the lead, and then have a product they could sell at a nice profit to the US, rather than the other way round.)
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2