Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Sunday June 28 2015, @05:03AM   Printer-friendly
from the government-overreach-at-its-finest dept.

The National Security Agency, while primarily occupied by sweeping up billions of phone calls, emails, texts and social media messages each day, wants better visual information about the earth and its residents, too, Admiral Michael Rogers said Wednesday.

"Signals intelligence ... ain't enough, you guys," the NSA chief told a gathering of contractors in the geospatial intelligence business. "We gotta create a much broader picture."

We need "the ability to visualize," he explained, because "man is fundamentally a visual creature."

Rogers, who also heads the Pentagon's United States Cyber Command, spent much of his keynote speech at the GEOINT 2015 conference pitching the technology, intelligence and defense companies in the audience on the importance of working together. The conference's slogan — appropriate, given the government's ever-growing demands — is "open the aperture."

"It's all about partnerships," Rogers told the audience. "How can we harness the power of the commercial sector?"

In how many other ways could the Director of the NSA gain a new perspective on the world?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Sunday June 28 2015, @09:28PM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Sunday June 28 2015, @09:28PM (#202502) Journal
    One in the East European block, prior to '90-ies. I've seen it for 25y+.
    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Sunday June 28 2015, @09:55PM

    by kaszz (4211) on Sunday June 28 2015, @09:55PM (#202506) Journal

    What would you say was the key aspect to survive and thrive in a east European country in the 80s?

    • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Sunday June 28 2015, @10:24PM

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Sunday June 28 2015, @10:24PM (#202516) Journal

      What would you say was the key aspect to survive and thrive in a east European country in the 80s?

      Survive: be very careful what and to whom you speak you mind. Most of the time, don't! (not even with your own kids until they get to a certain age they can understand). With those you do, you'll be slowly slipping into an obfuscation technique similar to "Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra" (metaphors based on a shared experience).

      Thrive: only by collaborating with the oppressive regime. I suppose it wasn't without perils, backstabbing was frequent (may be different in today's US, where economic status is not - yet? - related to the obedience to the regime)

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
      • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Sunday June 28 2015, @11:11PM

        by kaszz (4211) on Sunday June 28 2015, @11:11PM (#202531) Journal

        Seems only psychologically self mutilating people would manage that kind of environment for long. Or one better enjoy ones own company really good. I guess people not mingling with others were viewed as suspicious too?

        That thing with metaphors based on a shared experience seems like challenge-response used in certain computer systems.

        • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday June 29 2015, @12:07AM

          by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday June 29 2015, @12:07AM (#202543) Journal

          Seems only psychologically self mutilating people would manage that kind of environment for long.

          You'd be surprised how the threat of physical mutilation acts on psychology.
          Besides, many generations were born into this as "a state of normalcy" - this is your everyday life.

          Or one better enjoy ones own company really good.

          You have to, yes. But anyway, it was only dissent to the "communist values" that was punishable by "being disapperared", so as long as you didn't show this dissent, you'd be able to live your "normal" life.
          Showing individual small scale private initiative was "profiteering", you'd certainly get a public "kangaroo court" to make from you an as best example as one could.

          I guess people not mingling with others were viewed as suspicious too?

          Nope, the authorities weren't afraid of "lone wolfs"; what could they do?

          --
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
          • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Monday June 29 2015, @12:28AM

            by kaszz (4211) on Monday June 29 2015, @12:28AM (#202551) Journal

            Guess this also the path to economic stagnation..

            • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday June 29 2015, @01:32AM

              by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday June 29 2015, @01:32AM (#202575) Journal

              Guess this also the path to economic stagnation..

              You don't have to guess. Note that neither capitalism is immune to economic collapse, with some causes being common to the two [wikipedia.org] (and this even ignoring oppression).

              --
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford