Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Tuesday June 30 2015, @05:58AM   Printer-friendly
from the not-a-walk-in-the-park dept.

In a major setback for President Obama and for people who like to breathe, the court (in a 5-4 decision split along party lines) struck down a set of recent EPA regulations aimed at limiting pollution from coal-fired power plants.

Quoth the Guardian:

The justices embraced the arguments from the industry and 21 Republican-led states that the EPA rules were prohibitively expensive and amounted to government overreach.

The decision, written by Justice Antonin Scalia, ruled that the EPA did not reasonably consider the cost factor when drafting regulation.

The Clean Air Act had directed the EPA to create regulations for power plants that were "appropriate and necessary". The agency did not consider cost when making its decision, the court ruled, but estimated that the cost of its regulation to power plants would be $9.6bn a year.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Tuesday June 30 2015, @04:01PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Tuesday June 30 2015, @04:01PM (#203336)

    > costs are socialized

    Actually, we need to repeal Obamacare to allow Private Insurers to deny lung-disease claims.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2