Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday June 30 2015, @05:15PM   Printer-friendly
from the you-mean-sombody-hadn't-realised? dept.

The New York Times published an article on Sunday confirming what we've all assumed — that internet privacy policies are so full of loopholes as to be meaningless. They found that of the 100 top alexa-ranked english-language websites, 85 had privacy policies that permitted them to disclose users' personal information in cases of mergers, bankruptcy, asset sales and other business transactions.

When sites and apps get acquired or go bankrupt, the consumer data they have amassed may be among the companies' most valuable assets. And that has created an incentive for some online services to collect vast databases on people without giving them the power to decide which companies, or industries, may end up with their information.

"In effect, there's a race to the bottom as companies make representations that are weak and provide little actual privacy protection to consumers," said Marc Rotenberg, the executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a nonprofit research center in Washington.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Tuesday June 30 2015, @08:39PM

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Tuesday June 30 2015, @08:39PM (#203492) Journal

    I use the identity of people who previously lived at my current address.

    I hope you did some checks on them first. Otherwise you might one day have an unexpected visit from a debt collector …

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 30 2015, @09:48PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 30 2015, @09:48PM (#203519)

    I actually did get a visit. But not for the identity I had chosen. There is not much they could do anyway, if they were to serve me papers for the real person it would suck for the real person who is probably already in trouble anyway.