Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday July 01 2015, @05:29AM   Printer-friendly
from the did-you-really-just-call-her-that? dept.

Google Photo tries to categorize your pictures automatically. Until very recently, it had a failure mode in which its classification for some pictures of humans was "Gorillas".

Google reacted [and apologised] very quickly when they got a complaint from a black woman who had been misclassified.

When Brooklyn-based computer programmer Jacky Alcine looked over a set of images that he had uploaded to Google Photos on Sunday, he found that the service had attempted to classify them according to their contents. Google offers this capability as a selling point of its service, boasting that it lets you, “Search by what you remember about a photo, no description needed.” In Alcine’s case, many of those labels were basically accurate: A photograph of an airplane wing had been filed under “Airplanes,” one of two tall buildings under “Skyscrapers,” and so on.

Then there was a picture of Alcine and a friend. They’re both black. And Google had labeled the photo “Gorillas.” On investigation, Alcine found that many more photographs of the pair—and nothing else—had been placed under this literally dehumanizing rubric.

Speculating, it's possible that their software is heavy on statistical matching and it's really hard to debug, which is why they wound up simply deleting "Gorilla" from the list of possible categories.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2015/06/30/google_s_image_recognition_software_returns_some_surprisingly_racist_results.html


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Gravis on Wednesday July 01 2015, @06:17AM

    by Gravis (4596) on Wednesday July 01 2015, @06:17AM (#203642)

    *TO A COMPUTER* Gorillas have the same humanoid shape as people

    oh SUUUUURE. what are you going to claim next, a computer labeling a donkey as a horse is understandable?!

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by arslan on Wednesday July 01 2015, @06:40AM

    by arslan (3462) on Wednesday July 01 2015, @06:40AM (#203645)

    The donkey would be quite happy...

    • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday July 01 2015, @06:52AM

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday July 01 2015, @06:52AM (#203647) Journal
      The horse would be offended to be tagged an ass, a wild ass [wikipedia.org] even more.
      Understandable; wouldn't you feel the same?
      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 5, Funny) by fritsd on Wednesday July 01 2015, @09:19AM

      by fritsd (4586) on Wednesday July 01 2015, @09:19AM (#203686) Journal

      Did you hear that, Shrek? I'm a *STEED* !!1!