Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday July 01 2015, @05:29AM   Printer-friendly
from the did-you-really-just-call-her-that? dept.

Google Photo tries to categorize your pictures automatically. Until very recently, it had a failure mode in which its classification for some pictures of humans was "Gorillas".

Google reacted [and apologised] very quickly when they got a complaint from a black woman who had been misclassified.

When Brooklyn-based computer programmer Jacky Alcine looked over a set of images that he had uploaded to Google Photos on Sunday, he found that the service had attempted to classify them according to their contents. Google offers this capability as a selling point of its service, boasting that it lets you, “Search by what you remember about a photo, no description needed.” In Alcine’s case, many of those labels were basically accurate: A photograph of an airplane wing had been filed under “Airplanes,” one of two tall buildings under “Skyscrapers,” and so on.

Then there was a picture of Alcine and a friend. They’re both black. And Google had labeled the photo “Gorillas.” On investigation, Alcine found that many more photographs of the pair—and nothing else—had been placed under this literally dehumanizing rubric.

Speculating, it's possible that their software is heavy on statistical matching and it's really hard to debug, which is why they wound up simply deleting "Gorilla" from the list of possible categories.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2015/06/30/google_s_image_recognition_software_returns_some_surprisingly_racist_results.html


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by linuxrocks123 on Wednesday July 01 2015, @09:21AM

    by linuxrocks123 (2557) on Wednesday July 01 2015, @09:21AM (#203688) Journal

    Apologies. That's a good idea: detect faces, and then spend extra effort trying to classify the species of the face if it's not obvious from other parts of the photo.

    Many photos wouldn't need the extra effort, even if there's a face, because you know from the wearing of clothing and/or shape of the body that it is or isn't a human.

    It would be nice if Google would post some information about their algorithms in general, how they went wrong in this case, and what they're doing to fix it.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2