Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday July 01 2015, @05:29AM   Printer-friendly
from the did-you-really-just-call-her-that? dept.

Google Photo tries to categorize your pictures automatically. Until very recently, it had a failure mode in which its classification for some pictures of humans was "Gorillas".

Google reacted [and apologised] very quickly when they got a complaint from a black woman who had been misclassified.

When Brooklyn-based computer programmer Jacky Alcine looked over a set of images that he had uploaded to Google Photos on Sunday, he found that the service had attempted to classify them according to their contents. Google offers this capability as a selling point of its service, boasting that it lets you, “Search by what you remember about a photo, no description needed.” In Alcine’s case, many of those labels were basically accurate: A photograph of an airplane wing had been filed under “Airplanes,” one of two tall buildings under “Skyscrapers,” and so on.

Then there was a picture of Alcine and a friend. They’re both black. And Google had labeled the photo “Gorillas.” On investigation, Alcine found that many more photographs of the pair—and nothing else—had been placed under this literally dehumanizing rubric.

Speculating, it's possible that their software is heavy on statistical matching and it's really hard to debug, which is why they wound up simply deleting "Gorilla" from the list of possible categories.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2015/06/30/google_s_image_recognition_software_returns_some_surprisingly_racist_results.html


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 01 2015, @10:21PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 01 2015, @10:21PM (#203984)

    > The comparison wouldn't be offensive if it didn't have some truth to it.

    Are you honestly ignorant of the long history of racial slurs against black people comparing them to apes and gorillas?

    Here's one against Michelle Obama. [wistv.com]

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 01 2015, @10:40PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 01 2015, @10:40PM (#203995)

    "Are you honestly ignorant of the long history of racial slurs"

    And, are you honestly ignorant of the fact that people resemble monkeys and apes? Are you honestly ignorant that coloration tends to reinforce the resemblances? You might address the issue, rather than slamming reasonable observations. No one gives a fuck about your sensitive little feelings.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 02 2015, @12:06AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 02 2015, @12:06AM (#204023)

      > And, are you honestly ignorant of the fact that people resemble monkeys and apes?

      Which has absolutely nothing to do with why the comparison is 'offensive.'