Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Tuesday July 07 2015, @10:01AM   Printer-friendly
from the always-more-data-to-store dept.

Big things can come in small packages. According to Computerworld, Samsung has released the world's first 2 TB consumer SSDs:

Samsung today announced what it is calling the first multi-terabyte consumer solid-state drive (SSD), which will offer 2TB of capacity in a 2.5-in. form factor for laptops and desktops.

[...] The 850 Pro is designed for power users and client PCs that may need higher performance with up to 550MBps sequential read and 520MBps sequential write rates and up to 100,000 random I/Os per second (IOPS). The 850 EVO SSD has slightly lower performance with 540MBps and 520MBps sequential read/write rates and up to 90,000 random IOPS.

The 2TB model of the 850 Pro will retail for $999.99 and the 850 EVO will sell for $799.99.

The 1TB EVO SSD will retail for $399; the 500GB for $179; the 250GB for $99 and the 120GB for $69. The 1TB 850 Pro will retail for $499; the 512GB model for $259; the 256GB model for $144.99 and the 128GB model for $99.

[...] Samsung guarantees the 2TB 850 Pro for 10 years or 300 terabytes written (TBW), and the 2TB 850 EVO for five years or 150 TBW.

To put that in perspective, there are approximately 7 billion people on earth. One of these drives has sufficient space to keep about 285 bytes of information on every single person on the planet! Put another way, that is over 6 KB for every single person in the USA.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Kilo110 on Tuesday July 07 2015, @05:57PM

    by Kilo110 (2853) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday July 07 2015, @05:57PM (#206180)

    Wow, a little civility goes a long way. You are encouraged to not sound like an ass when conversing with others.

    Anyway...

    Every mlc SSD uses some form of data randomization. Encryption is a common way to achieve that. Enjoy http://soc.yonsei.ac.kr/Abstract/International_journal/pdf/106_Data%20Randomization%20Scheme%20for%20Endurance%20Enhancement%20and%20Interference%20Mitigation%20of%20Multilevel%20Flash%20Memory%20Devices.pdf [yonsei.ac.kr]

    Also, as the other reply said, adding that feature costs money to develop so not every product will have it. I use a crucial m500 which supports eDrive on my bitlocker windows laptop. eDrive is a MS implementation of changing the master key. So I get instant "encryption" times with zero performance loss.

    And yes, it's very common for potential features to be omitted due to time and cost constraints.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2015, @09:20PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2015, @09:20PM (#206226)

    > Wow, a little civility goes a long way. You are encouraged to not sound like an ass when conversing with others.

    Whose the bigger ass, the guy makes a bullshit claim or the guy who calls them on their bullshit?
    You bluntly asserted a falsehood, you've got no standing to whine about being bluntly challenged.

    Actual working link to the cited paper, [etri.re.kr] thank you very much.

    Cited paper says absolutely nothing about encryption at all.

    > I use a crucial m500...

    Me too! Twinsies!

    > And yes, it's very common for potential features to be omitted due to time and cost constraints.

    And as I said in response - full-disk encryption is a very marketable attribute, the marginal cost of exposing it to the BIOS using the standardized SATA command-set is tiny compared to the increased value in the marketplace making it a no-brainer. Perhaps not on the first firmware revision in the rush to market, but any update afterwards would certainly contain it. Citing another soylent post that itself contains no citations is not even close to a "reputable 3rd party support."

    • (Score: 2) by Kilo110 on Wednesday July 08 2015, @03:39PM

      by Kilo110 (2853) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday July 08 2015, @03:39PM (#206484)

      Easily the latter as you are perfectly capable of refuting a claim without being an ass. Sorry bro, you're being an unnecessary asshole and trying to justify your attitude by blaming my supposedly incorrect statement doesn't change that. Learn some social skills. I hope you know how to behave in public as there are more penalties for that behavior in that realm than online.

      I said patterns are bad. You said I was wrong. I provided a paper to show I'm right when I said patterns are bad. Encryption is one way to break up patterns and it has other benefits too. Compression is another method. There are others, one such was outlined in the paper I linked.

      And who knows why companies don't show the feature. Maybe it's product and market segmentation (enterprise drives get it but consumer drives don't). Maybe some idiot somewhere in management or accounting decided not to add it to save a few bucks. Samsung disks got firmware updates adding edrive to many ssd 1-2 years ago. More companies are coming around to it. The feature exists but often isn't given to the user. The world isn't ideal. Get over it.

  • (Score: 2) by hankwang on Wednesday July 08 2015, @06:59AM

    by hankwang (100) on Wednesday July 08 2015, @06:59AM (#206364) Homepage

    "every mlc SSD uses some form of data randomization. Encryption is a common way to achieve that."

    Encryption is not a common way to achieve that; it's an expensive way. The paper you cited (link provided by the helpful AC) talks of an 8-bit pseudorandom generator, presumably with a period of 255. A decent encryption (AES) will require vastly more silicon to deal with 500 MB/s throughput.