Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by CoolHand on Tuesday July 07 2015, @10:44PM   Printer-friendly
from the ponce-de-leon dept.

Ever notice at your high school reunions how some classmates look ten years older than everybody else - and some look ten years younger. Now BBC reports that a study of people born within a year of each other has uncovered a huge gulf in the speed at which human bodies bodies age. The report tracked traits such as weight, kidney function and gum health and found that some of the 38-year-olds in the study were aging so badly that their "biological age" was on the cusp of retirement. "They look rough, they look lacking in vitality," says Prof Terrie Moffitt. The study says some people had almost stopped aging during the period of the study, while others were gaining nearly three years of biological age for every twelve months that passed. "Any area of life where we currently use chronological age is faulty, if we knew more about biological age we could be more fair and egalitarian," says Moffitt.

The researchers studied aging in 954 young humans, the Dunedin Study birth cohort, tracking multiple biomarkers across three time points spanning their third and fourth decades of life. They developed and validated two methods by which aging can be measured in young adults, one cross-sectional and one longitudinal. According to Moffit the science of healthspan extension may be focused on the wrong end of the lifespan; rather than only studying old humans, geroscience should also study the young. "Eventually if we really want to slow the process of aging to prevent the onset of disease we're going to have to intervene with young people."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by ese002 on Wednesday July 08 2015, @10:00PM

    by ese002 (5306) on Wednesday July 08 2015, @10:00PM (#206624)

    This is a boomer story, that's why its about old people. Younger people have a huge variation too.

    As a 14 year old boy, having discovered girls, I was WELL aware that girls my age varied in appearance from approximately 10 to 22 std years yet I know darn well she's my age. Highly non linear curves, also in the age appearance vs chronological age graphs.

    Different process. In the very young, it is a difference in maturation rate. The decay that is aging is not apparent yet and there is no particular reason to think those that mature earlier will live shorter lives.