At last, some of those who know more than most have publicly entered the fray regarding the establishment of governmental backdoors to encryption technologies. The New York Times published an article today which says:
An elite group of code makers and code breakers is taking American and British intelligence and law enforcement agencies to task in a new paper that evaluates government proposals to maintain special access to encrypted digital communications.
On Tuesday, the group — 13 of the world's pre-eminent cryptographers, computer scientists and security specialists — released the paper, which concludes there is no viable technical solution that would allow the American and British governments to gain "exceptional access" to encrypted communications without putting the world's most confidential data and critical infrastructure in danger. [...]
The authors of the report said such fears did not justify putting the world's digital communications at risk. Given the inherent vulnerabilities of the Internet, they argued, reducing encryption is not an option. Handing governments a key to encrypted communications would also require an extraordinary degree of trust.
One interesting issue they brought up relates to recent disturbing news:
With government agency breaches now the norm — most recently at the United States Office of Personnel Management, the State Department and the White House — the security specialists said authorities cannot be trusted to keep such keys safe from hackers and criminals.
Additional link of interest: the 34-page paper written by Harold Abelson, Ross Anderson, Steven M. Bellovin, Josh Benaloh, Matthew Blaze, Whitfield Diffie, John Gilmore, Matthew Green, Peter G. Neumann, Susan Landau, Ronald L. Rivest, Jeffrey I. Schiller, Bruce Schneier, Michael Specter, and Daniel J. Weitzner.
takyon: Security gurus deliver coup de grace to US govt's encryption backdoor demands
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2015, @03:36PM
Well, given that also without encryption there will be terrorism, I prefer terrorism + encryption to terrorism + no encryption.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by bob_super on Wednesday July 08 2015, @04:40PM
Ici Londres. Les francais parlent aux francais.
Les carottes sont cuites.
Je repete...
Les carottes sont cuites.
Yep, the Germans could clearly hear the WW2 unencrypted radio messages. That doesn't mean they could figure out what the Resistance was going to blow up next.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday July 08 2015, @04:43PM
Well, the terrorists are going to have encryption anyway, so there really isn't a choice of "terrorism + no encryption". Terrorists may be low-lifes, but low-life is not exactly synonymous with "stupid".