Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday July 10 2015, @01:32AM   Printer-friendly
from the Moore's-Law-fail dept.

Numerous sources are reporting that IBM's recent $3 billion investment in new chipmaking technologies and collaboration with the State University of New York in Albany, GlobalFoundries, and Samsung Electronics Co. is beginning to bear fruit. IBM has developed chips with functional transistors using a 7 nanometer process technology.

In particular, silicon-germanium (SiGe) has been incorporated into FinFET transistors, the fins of which are stacked at a pitch of less than 30nm, compared to a 42nm pitch for Intel's 14nm Broadwell chips. Long delayed extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography from ASML was used to etch the features. Although ASML's EUV tools are still slower and more expensive than conventional lithography, Michael Liehr, the executive vice president for innovation and technology at the SUNY Poly research center, predicted that ASML would improve EUV over the next four to six years, before 7nm chips are set to reach the market. More aggressive estimates put the introduction of 7nm chips around 2017-2018.

Ars Technica has a story on this topic with more technical background.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 10 2015, @04:15AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 10 2015, @04:15AM (#207261)

    Here "Ars Technica" is a proper noun, therefore a singular case.

  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday July 10 2015, @09:21AM

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Friday July 10 2015, @09:21AM (#207341) Homepage
    "The Spice Girls" is a proper noun too, is it singular? I can only imagine "The Spice Girls have reformed" as a headline (in my nightmares).

    Your rule isn't a rule. A better answer is "it depends what side of the atlantic you're on, and the type of the entity you're talking about, and the precise form of the name, and on various other intangibles", with the rider "even once you've specified all those, a lot of the time it can still be either".

    The correct answer is of course "linguistics isn't prescriptive or proscriptive, it's descriptive - if people repeatedly use it to successfully communicate, it's by definition correct communication". KTHXBYE
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves