Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Saturday July 11 2015, @04:40AM   Printer-friendly
from the titilation-saturation dept.

In the study of about 1,400 US youths, 47% of middle-school boys and 61% of high school boys agreed that women are treated as sex objects too often in games.

The findings, gathered by education consultant Rosalind Wiseman and games writer Ashley Burch, counter familiar assumptions that boys will voraciously consume media images of scantily clad women without a second thought.

For many years in the mainstream games industry, there has been an apparent assumption that the male teen demographic was the only one that mattered. Much of the time this meant beefy male protagonists (to identify with – or aspire to) and sexualised women (too gaze at or rescue).

The survey questions and methodology used are not disclosed in the article.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 11 2015, @07:50AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 11 2015, @07:50AM (#207806)

    Women can have very sexy womanly figures even without any bust to speak of. It's petty to be narrow-minded about acceptable forms of breast fetishism.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Subsentient on Saturday July 11 2015, @09:32AM

    by Subsentient (1111) on Saturday July 11 2015, @09:32AM (#207820) Homepage Journal

    I myself am an ass man, but I don't tend to like oversized breasts.

    --
    "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." -Jiddu Krishnamurti
    • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 11 2015, @10:24AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 11 2015, @10:24AM (#207825)

      Do you have a superpower?

      • (Score: 4, Funny) by Subsentient on Saturday July 11 2015, @11:11AM

        by Subsentient (1111) on Saturday July 11 2015, @11:11AM (#207837) Homepage Journal

        I can control space and time in ways beyond your comprehension, but other than that, no.

        --
        "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." -Jiddu Krishnamurti
        • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Saturday July 11 2015, @08:39PM

          by Gaaark (41) on Saturday July 11 2015, @08:39PM (#207985) Journal

          So you control space in order to make their butts bigger and their chests smaller?

          --
          --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Magic Oddball on Saturday July 11 2015, @12:55PM

    by Magic Oddball (3847) on Saturday July 11 2015, @12:55PM (#207858) Journal

    Puberty's primary structural changes to a girl are to add fat onto the chest & butt/thighs in some degree, so it wouldn't make sense to say that one can have a totally flat chest and have a "womanly" (adult post-pubertal female) figure. I'm certain that there's plenty of hetero men & lesbians that prefer flat-chested girls/women, though, since there's seemingly a fetish for just about everything...

    I'm not sure what you mean by "breast feminism" though — it's kind of a nonsense phrase, given feminism is supposed to be about men & women having the same right to live without being forced/pressured to follow gender stereotypes (e.g. so both can wear skirts or pants without being harassed/mistreated, get paid the same for the same quality of work, etc.).

    • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 11 2015, @01:00PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 11 2015, @01:00PM (#207861)

      Time for some new glasses Mr Oddball. He typed fetishism, not feminism.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 11 2015, @03:51PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 11 2015, @03:51PM (#207904)

      so it wouldn't make sense to say that one can have a totally flat chest and have a "womanly"

      I submit (NSFW)evidence to the contrary [ixquick.com].

    • (Score: 2) by darkfeline on Saturday July 11 2015, @11:02PM

      by darkfeline (1030) on Saturday July 11 2015, @11:02PM (#208009) Homepage

      I don't think it's possible to have a "totally flat" chest, whatever that means. I mean, physiologically, as a skinny male, I don't have a totally flat chest either (pectoral muscles). Likewise, even the most skinny and flat woman is bound to have some chest, by virtue of physiological, post-puberty stuff existing there (someone with more medical knowledge is welcome to elaborate further). Given that, I don't see anything wrong with a preference for small/flat/bare minimum breasts.

      In fact, the average (natural) female breast size is B (ranging from A to C depending on genetic and cultural ethnicity) (citation needed). One could say big boobs are unnatural and liking big boobs is a fetish/sexual deviation.

      --
      Join the SDF Public Access UNIX System today!
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 13 2015, @04:18AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 13 2015, @04:18AM (#208341)

        One could say big boobs are unnatural and liking big boobs is a fetish/sexual deviation.

        The number of big boobs is irrelevant; what matters is how many people like them. Only by knowing that can you decide whether or not to classify it as a "sexual deviation."

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 13 2015, @04:21AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 13 2015, @04:21AM (#208342)

        Big boobs can't be unnatural because everything is part of nature.