SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
In the study of about 1,400 US youths, 47% of middle-school boys and 61% of high school boys agreed that women are treated as sex objects too often in games.
The findings, gathered by education consultant Rosalind Wiseman and games writer Ashley Burch, counter familiar assumptions that boys will voraciously consume media images of scantily clad women without a second thought.
For many years in the mainstream games industry, there has been an apparent assumption that the male teen demographic was the only one that mattered. Much of the time this meant beefy male protagonists (to identify with – or aspire to) and sexualised women (too gaze at or rescue).
The survey questions and methodology used are not disclosed in the article.
Original Submission
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Survey Says Even Teenage Boys are Sick of Sexist Video Games
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 82 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
There's no such thing as an original sin.
-- Elvis Costello
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Magic Oddball on Saturday July 11 2015, @12:55PM
Puberty's primary structural changes to a girl are to add fat onto the chest & butt/thighs in some degree, so it wouldn't make sense to say that one can have a totally flat chest and have a "womanly" (adult post-pubertal female) figure. I'm certain that there's plenty of hetero men & lesbians that prefer flat-chested girls/women, though, since there's seemingly a fetish for just about everything...
I'm not sure what you mean by "breast feminism" though — it's kind of a nonsense phrase, given feminism is supposed to be about men & women having the same right to live without being forced/pressured to follow gender stereotypes (e.g. so both can wear skirts or pants without being harassed/mistreated, get paid the same for the same quality of work, etc.).
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 11 2015, @01:00PM
Time for some new glasses Mr Oddball. He typed fetishism, not feminism.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 11 2015, @03:51PM
so it wouldn't make sense to say that one can have a totally flat chest and have a "womanly"
I submit (NSFW)evidence to the contrary [ixquick.com].
(Score: 2) by darkfeline on Saturday July 11 2015, @11:02PM
I don't think it's possible to have a "totally flat" chest, whatever that means. I mean, physiologically, as a skinny male, I don't have a totally flat chest either (pectoral muscles). Likewise, even the most skinny and flat woman is bound to have some chest, by virtue of physiological, post-puberty stuff existing there (someone with more medical knowledge is welcome to elaborate further). Given that, I don't see anything wrong with a preference for small/flat/bare minimum breasts.
In fact, the average (natural) female breast size is B (ranging from A to C depending on genetic and cultural ethnicity) (citation needed). One could say big boobs are unnatural and liking big boobs is a fetish/sexual deviation.
Join the SDF Public Access UNIX System today!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 13 2015, @04:18AM
One could say big boobs are unnatural and liking big boobs is a fetish/sexual deviation.
The number of big boobs is irrelevant; what matters is how many people like them. Only by knowing that can you decide whether or not to classify it as a "sexual deviation."
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 13 2015, @04:21AM
Big boobs can't be unnatural because everything is part of nature.