Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Sunday July 12 2015, @11:25AM   Printer-friendly
from the eject-the-core dept.

Anna North writes in the NY Times about Star Trek's "post-economic" system, in which money no longer exists and anything you want can be made in a replicator, essentially for free. According to Manu Saadia, the author of "Trekonomics," a forthcoming book about the economics of the Star Trek universe, when everything is free, objects will no longer be status symbols. Success will be measured in achievements, not in money: "Instead of working to become more wealthy, you work to increase your reputation," says Saadia. "You work to increase your prestige. You want to be the best captain or the best scientist in the entire galaxy. And many other people are working to do that, as well. It's very meritocratic"

In a time of rising inequality and stagnating wages, a world where everyone's needs are met and people only work if they feel like it seems pretty far away but a post-scarcity economy is actually far more within reach than the technological advances for which Star Trek is better known. If productivity growth continues, Saadia believes there will be much more wealth to go around in a few hundred years' time. In general, society might look more like present-day New Zealand, which he sees as less work-obsessed than the United States: "You work to live rather than the other way round." Wealthy retirees today also already live an essentially post-money existence, "traveling and exploring and deepening their understanding of the world and being generally happy." According to Saadia we're beginning to get a few hints of what the post-money, reputation-based economy might look like. "If you look at things like Instagram, Vine, places where people put a huge amount of work into basically just gaining a certain amount of reputation, it's fascinating to see. Or even Wikipedia, for that matter. The Internet has begun to give us a hint of how much people will work, for no money, just for reputation."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday July 13 2015, @12:30AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday July 13 2015, @12:30AM (#208275) Journal

    looking how the things go, US doesn't believe the middle class is necessary.

    The US just isn't competing that well against the Third World and wealth from labor has declined versus wealth from capital. No beliefs about the middle class are needed.

  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday July 13 2015, @03:55AM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday July 13 2015, @03:55AM (#208331) Journal

    looking how the things go, US doesn't believe the middle class is necessary.

    The US just isn't competing that well against the Third World and wealth from labor has declined versus wealth from capital.

    So, US capital does no longer need both US middle-class and the poor one, because they aren't poor enough to compete with others even more poor than them?
    Mmmm... I wonder who will pay for whatever the US capital chooses to finance?

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday July 13 2015, @03:36PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday July 13 2015, @03:36PM (#208530) Journal

      So, US capital does no longer need both US middle-class and the poor one, because they aren't poor enough to compete with others even more poor than them?

      No, I think it's more that US labor has priced itself out of the market.

      Mmmm... I wonder who will pay for whatever the US capital chooses to finance?

      Look at who has robust, growing economies. I'd say China and India for starters.