A court battle between a divorced couple over the future of their frozen embryos began Monday with an attorney for the former husband accusing the woman of using the dispute to get money.
Dr. Mimi Lee, 46, a pianist and part-time anesthesiologist, married Stephen Findley, a wealthy executive, five years ago. Shortly before the wedding, Lee learned she had breast cancer.
Unsure whether the disease would make it impossible for her to have children, the couple went to a fertility center, where Lee's eggs and Findley's sperm created five embryos, now frozen.
Findley filed for divorce two years ago and wants the embryos destroyed. Lee, now infertile, wants to implant the embryos into a surrogate and have a baby. Without the embryos, she will never have a child who shares her genes.
If the embryos are implanted and carry to term, the ex-husband becomes a father without consent. If the embryos are destroyed, the ex-wife is denied the deep need to procreate. The embryos themselves have issues either way. Modern biomedical ethics are complex.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Kilo110 on Wednesday July 15 2015, @09:57PM
Why did they freeze embryos instead of the sperm and eggs separately?
on another note.
"If a child is genetically his … he will participate in the child’s life,”
^^ this case will make for an awkward conversation "yeah sorry kiddo, I sued your mother to have you destroyed and lost... Want to go play ball?"
(Score: 5, Informative) by penguinoid on Wednesday July 15 2015, @11:13PM
Why did they freeze embryos instead of the sperm and eggs separately?
The embryos survive better than the eggs when frozen (barring agreements to destroy them in case of divorce).
RIP Slashdot. Killed by greedy bastards.