Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Thursday July 16 2015, @02:24PM   Printer-friendly

Qualcomm is under investigation by the European Union's antitrust authority, which suspects the company of abusing its dominant position in the market for 3G and 4G chipsets used in smartphones and tablets.

The European Commission has initiated proceedings against Qualcomm in two investigations, it said Thursday. The first concerns whether Qualcomm breached EU antitrust rules by offering financial incentives to phone manufacturers on condition that they buy chipsets exclusively, or mostly, from the company; the second, whether Qualcomm engaged in predatory pricing, selling below cost to force competitors out of the market.

Mobile processors and baseband chipsets, which handle the communications protocols used in wireless networks, form a significant proportion of the cost of a mobile phone and, at least at the low end of the market, margins are getting thinner, leaving phonemakers more vulnerable to pricing pressures from their suppliers.

The EU Commissioner in charge of competition policy, Margrethe Vestager, said "We are launching these investigations because we want to be sure that high tech suppliers can compete on the merits of their products. Many customers use electronic devices such as a mobile phone or a tablet and we want to ensure that they ultimately get value for money. Effective competition is the best way to stimulate innovation."

Qualcomm's business practices have come under antitrust authorities' scrutiny before. Earlier this year, Chinese regulators fined Qualcomm $975 million for overcharging device makers there.

[...]

Qualcomm said it had been notified that the Commission had initiated proceedings against it in the two ongoing investigations. It will continue to cooperate with the Commission, but believes the concerns are without merit, it said.

More coverage of this story can be found at The Register and ITWorld.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 16 2015, @05:27PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 16 2015, @05:27PM (#210060)

    Well, in that case, carry on whining.

    Translation: You have no evidence to back up your claims so you'll just sling ad homs.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 16 2015, @06:45PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 16 2015, @06:45PM (#210101)

    Well, in that case, carry on whining.

    Translation: You have no evidence to back up your claims so you'll just sling ad homs.

    Nice to see the tradition of the "ugly American" continued with such verve! And yes, this is an argumentum ad hominem, but that is not always a fallacy, since sometimes the moral character of the person is relevant to the case.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 16 2015, @08:27PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 16 2015, @08:27PM (#210154)

      American? Hardly. I'm about 100 kg too light to be an American.