Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by takyon on Friday July 17 2015, @11:35AM   Printer-friendly
from the bacon-is-natural dept.

Scientists are currently cultivating a marine plant that's packed with more nutrients than the trendy green superfood kale. And it naturally tastes like bacon.

Bacon-flavored crackers. Bacon-flavored salad dressing. These are just two of the savory treats that have been created so far using the domesticated strain of dulse (Palmaria palmata), a kind of red algae, or seaweed, that typically grows in the waters along northern Pacific and Atlantic coastlines.

I wonder if this will pass muster with my kosher- and halal-observing friends.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by ThePhilips on Friday July 17 2015, @12:56PM

    by ThePhilips (5677) on Friday July 17 2015, @12:56PM (#210402)

    So is there any indication that it is actually more healthy than average food?

    There is no "healthiness" metric for the food, and nutrition/dietology is still closer to the witchcraft than to a real science.

    In other words: no indication is possible at all.

    Nutrition is complicated and important topic, but you rarely hear voices for funding more research. The nerd crowd would rather dream about the space travel, than finding out why the just eaten muffin could give them the food poisoning.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 17 2015, @03:32PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 17 2015, @03:32PM (#210468)

    This is very true.

    For example a 2 liter of pepsi is considered 'low fat'.

    Now is that healthy to drink? Not really. Is it OK to drink? Sure but dont do it all the time.

    • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Friday July 17 2015, @05:53PM

      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday July 17 2015, @05:53PM (#210520) Journal

      For example a 2 liter of pepsi is considered 'low fat'.
       
      Well, how much fat is actually in Pepsi? Not much.
       
      Which makes it a true (though misleading) statement. It's up to you to know that a bajillion calories and grams of sugar also isn't good for you.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 17 2015, @10:42PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 17 2015, @10:42PM (#210639)

        Well, how much fat is actually in Pepsi? Not much.

        Which makes it a true (though misleading) statement. It's up to you to know that a bajillion calories and grams of sugar also isn't good for you.

        Indeed. Proper nutrition considerations must take into account several different variables. Calories and fat content are only two such variables. It is left as an exercise for the reader to figure out the rest of these variables and how they are related.

      • (Score: 1) by ThePhilips on Saturday July 18 2015, @10:24AM

        by ThePhilips (5677) on Saturday July 18 2015, @10:24AM (#210740)

        Well, how much fat is actually in Pepsi? Not much.

        Fancy nutritional fact: human body is very good at converting the carbs into fat. It can also do the reverse - the fat to carbs - but at much slower rate.

        That's how you can get fat by eating exclusively low-fat: to keep the calorie count, most of the diets are high-carb. There are even low-fat/high-carb diets for gaining weight. (Classical example being the diet of sumo wrestlers.)