Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by NCommander on Saturday July 18 2015, @08:52AM   Printer-friendly
from the more-spam-for-spam-assassion dept.

A lighter piece on the performance of the CAN-SPAM anti-spam law:

...while I've accepted that my work inbox is going to be filled with junk, I go to great lengths to keep my private e-mail pristine. I use a personal domain instead of an emailprovider.com address, and the spammers haven't found it. Even my junk folder is empty. It's glorious.

Or at least it was, until I made the mistake of getting something at Best Buy. For a full four weeks, I received one or two e-mails a day from the ubiquitous retail store with subject lines like "4-HOUR SALE: Starts now," "You'd be crazy to pass on this," "Amazing deals end soon," and "Jon, save 15% on ink and toner."
...
It's been four weeks and my Best Buy account still hasn't been deleted. But the e-mails finally stopped, not through the efforts of Precious, Rod, or Helen, but because on June 25 I decided to write this article and contacted Best Buy's public relations team to give them a chance to comment.

I described the situation, mentioned that I had just filed a complaint with the FTC, and asked why it would take even 10 business days to stop spam e-mails or two to four weeks to delete an account.

"These are things that corporations with modern, functioning computer systems should be able to accomplish in seconds," I wrote. "I would be interested in learning the technical details of the system you are using so we can figure out what the problem is."

It's a common tale of woe. The author of TFA only got the spam to stop because of the PR hit he promised to land at Best Buy's feet. CAN-SPAM hasn't stopped them. What can, if you're not a journalist?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 18 2015, @10:44AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 18 2015, @10:44AM (#210744)

    You sound like a sociopath: others only exist for exploitation.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +3  
       Troll=1, Insightful=3, Informative=1, Total=5
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by kurenai.tsubasa on Saturday July 18 2015, @03:01PM

    by kurenai.tsubasa (5227) on Saturday July 18 2015, @03:01PM (#210790) Journal

    Hate to say, but welcome to USA! Land of cognitive dissonance, home of the sociopaths! Don't give me that do goody good bullshit. I'm in the high-fidelity first class traveling set, and I think I need a Lear jet!

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 18 2015, @10:54PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 18 2015, @10:54PM (#210892)
    Corporations are sociopathic; they exist only to make profit, generally by exploiting people and other corporations. This includes going beyond what is legal and continuing to whatever behavior increases profit without being punished. The person you replied to just sounds like they were saying "expect a duck to quack".