Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday July 20 2015, @12:38PM   Printer-friendly
from the or-not dept.

New research suggests that U.S. climate change, and the unpredictable temperature swings it can bring, may boost death rates in seniors.

"Temperature variability emerges as a key feature in the potential impacts of climate change. The take-home message: Unusual temperature is bad for people's health," said study author Liuhua Shi, a graduate student in the department of environmental health at Harvard's School of Public Health in Boston.

Scientists have long been debating the health effects of climate change, and the general assumption is that it will make people sicker through more extreme heat, more flooding and more polluted air.

Shi and colleagues launched their study in the New England area to better understand how weather affects death rates. "Many studies have reported associations between short-term temperature changes and increased daily deaths," Shi said. "However, there is little evidence to date on the long-term effect of temperature."

The researchers looked at Medicare statistics regarding 2.7 million people over the age of 65 in New England from 2000 to 2008. Of those, Shi said, 30 percent died during the study.

The researchers found death rates rose when the average summer temperature rose significantly, and death rates dropped when the average winter temperature rose significantly.

The researchers believe the increased risk in the summer is due to an increase in the variability of temperatures. According to Shi, "climate change may affect mortality rates by making seasonal weather more unpredictable, creating temperature conditions significantly different to those to which people have become acclimatized."

On the other hand, warmer winter temperatures caused by climate change could actually reduce deaths, the researchers added.

The study appears in the July 13 issue of Nature Climate Change.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 21 2015, @04:36AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 21 2015, @04:36AM (#211764)

    That paper says "amplified jetstream trajectories". I couldn't find any mention of the "weaker" jetstream you mention. Granted that term was used in a news article referencing this so it is probably just a vague, undefined concept.

    I have trouble imagining how taking a very complicated mechanism and dumping more energy into it will result in anything but more chaos.

    We might be butting up against the same problem. What do you mean by "chaos"? Venus is much warmer than earth at the surface and has a much more stable atmosphere, it also has very strong winds. It seems to be explained quite clearly by these simple models. The higher the heat capacity of the system, the more uniform and stable the atmosphere:

    The examples of these simple models show that vertical energy transport for a planet with a transparent atmosphere
    only smooths out the daily temperature curve, without being able to bring the surface temperature higher than the
    effective radiative temperature. The same is true if we were to add in more realistic horizontal energy transport from
    larger-scale atmospheric and oceanic circulation - of course getting much more realistic means entering the realm of
    more full-scale general circulation models5, which we have no intention of doing here.

    http://arxiv.org/pdf/0802.4324v1.pdf [arxiv.org]

  • (Score: 2) by Tork on Tuesday July 21 2015, @04:57AM

    by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday July 21 2015, @04:57AM (#211768)
    I'm sorry I don't have time to read the study right now, but I did want to mention that a Venutian day more than half a year long. True, it is warmer, but we've got a lot more motion happening over here.
    --
    🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 21 2015, @05:09AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 21 2015, @05:09AM (#211772)

      Yes, the model presented there accounts for rotation. All things being equal, a slower rotation (relative to the energy source: the sun) tends to cause more extreme differences, eg as seen for the moon.