A new set of gliders is being developed by a group of 19 European research organizations that will be able to go deeper than any other underwater robots have gone before, to 5,000 meters below the surface. The gliders will be chock full of onboard sensors that will take continuous samples of the water there, gathering data about the ecosystems down there as well as monitoring the water for pollution.
From the scientist's perspective more, better data is always a good thing. But scientists who need to compete for funding rarely keep that data to themselves and trumpet it in the public arena. The chance these undersea gliders could produce endless "The Oceans Are Dying!" memes is non-zero.
(Score: 4, Interesting) by takyon on Monday July 20 2015, @11:01PM
It seems poorly communicated but the main difference may be that these robots are untethered.
They seem like they are faster, cover more range, and don't require resurfacing as often.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by JNCF on Monday July 20 2015, @11:10PM
Ah, I could see being a pedantic asshole and arguing that a robot with a tether that leaves the water doesn't technically qualify as an "underwater" robot, but rather a semi-aquatic one. You're probably right.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 20 2015, @11:50PM
With so-called scientists fudging shits here and there, don't see why marketeers, advertisers, salesmen, and money shifters should be so vilified.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday July 21 2015, @05:47PM
1. Is it a lie?
2. Did the scientists produce the "lie", or was it journalists?
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]