Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Wednesday July 22 2015, @03:45PM   Printer-friendly
from the long-walkabout dept.

The exact process by which humanity introduced itself to the Americas has always been controversial. While there's general agreement on the most important migration—across the Bering land bridge at the end of the last ice age—there's a lot of arguing over the details. Now, two new papers clarify some of the bigger picture but also introduce a new wrinkle: there's DNA from the distant Pacific floating around in the genomes of Native Americans. And the two groups disagree about how it got there.
...
The Athabascans and Aleutian islanders also have a rather unexpected contribution from Australo-Melanesians, the natives of Australia, New Guinea, and the Andaman Islands. That, this study found, was absent in populations farther south.

Not so, says the study that focused on South American groups. Here, a strong signal from Australo-Melanesians was present in a number of Amazonian tribes; weaker affinities are scattered through South and Central America. At the same time, there are other groups in this region with no affinity to Australo-Melanesians.

It will be interesting to see if migration paths can be reconstructed as DNA from more locations in the Pacific can be sequenced.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by arslan on Thursday July 23 2015, @04:16AM

    by arslan (3462) on Thursday July 23 2015, @04:16AM (#212556)

    Tony Abbot, and most Aussie politicians from the 2 major camps (sounds like the U.S. doesn't it?), will ask "How much?" if an American politician says "Get bent!".

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2