SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
To cater to the majority American readers, some terminology has been changed.
Surgery on humans using robots has been touted by some as a safer way to get your innards repaired – and now the figures are in for you to judge.
A team of university [researchers] have counted up the number of medical [mistakes] in America reported to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 2000 to 2013, and found there were 144 deaths during robot-assisted surgery, 1,391 injuries, and 8,061 counts of device malfunctions.
If that sounds terrible, consider that 1.7 million robo-operations were carried out between 2007 and 2013. Whether you're impressed or appalled, the number of errors has the experts mildly concerned, and they want better safety mechanisms.
It's tricky to compare these robo-op figures to the error rate of pure-human surgeries for various dull reasons; one being that when mistakes are made, they're often settled out of court and are never admitted. With a machine involved, someone can blame the hardware. Between two and four per cent of operations in the US suffer from complications, according to one study, although that doesn't mean someone died in every case that went wrong.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/21/robot_surgery_kills_americans/
(Score: 4, Insightful) by jimshatt on Wednesday July 22 2015, @11:14PM
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 23 2015, @04:28PM
Yeah, it's a death rate of about 0.008%. And then, it is not even a given that all of them were machine malfunctions. It might also include cases where the mistake was by those operating the robot.