SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
To cater to the majority American readers, some terminology has been changed.
Surgery on humans using robots has been touted by some as a safer way to get your innards repaired – and now the figures are in for you to judge.
A team of university [researchers] have counted up the number of medical [mistakes] in America reported to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 2000 to 2013, and found there were 144 deaths during robot-assisted surgery, 1,391 injuries, and 8,061 counts of device malfunctions.
If that sounds terrible, consider that 1.7 million robo-operations were carried out between 2007 and 2013. Whether you're impressed or appalled, the number of errors has the experts mildly concerned, and they want better safety mechanisms.
It's tricky to compare these robo-op figures to the error rate of pure-human surgeries for various dull reasons; one being that when mistakes are made, they're often settled out of court and are never admitted. With a machine involved, someone can blame the hardware. Between two and four per cent of operations in the US suffer from complications, according to one study, although that doesn't mean someone died in every case that went wrong.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/21/robot_surgery_kills_americans/
(Score: 2, Informative) by sce7mjm on Thursday July 23 2015, @02:01PM
Agreed. I did some work which for a medical device which involved various probes and canulars all attached to a box of electronics. The competitors all did the same thing in almost the same way, except the probes and their connections differed to the machine. All requiring different methods of manufacture. This was due to the claim of one manufacturer holding the IP of that probe to that connector into that socket. Since it is quite a niche market no one could afford a court battle regardless of it being held up or not, the same probe with a different socket and different connector which then cost more to manufacture, all passed on to the customer of course. In fact the whole units where massively overpriced not because of massive profits but due to the cost of development being spread over (relatively) small production runs, including the selection of the front panel sockets to not collide with the competitors. Bonkers.