Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday July 24 2015, @03:53PM   Printer-friendly
from the its-a-start dept.

Researchers from the Group of Information Technology and Communications at Universidad Politécnica de Madrid have carried out a techno-economic assessment to define the most cost-efficient technology to supply 30 Megabit per second broadband to municipalities with less than 5000 inhabitants. By using this so-called "rocket model," the research group has found that LTE (a standard for wireless communication) is the most suitable technology to ensure the investment return of rural areas in Spain.

The new goals of Digital Agenda for Europe regarding fast and ultra-fast broadband have led to search for the best strategy to achieve them. However, there is not a general consensus about what is the best technology to achieve the aim of providing 30 Mbps broadband to 100% of population.

The difficulty in rural areas lies both in socio-demographic characteristics of the population (low population density, low average income, elderly residents and low digital literacy) and geographical characteristics. The geographical issues involve technical problems with major economic consequences.

There are two strategies to confront these difficulties: the development of fixed networks or using mobile networks. Spain chose the second option by linking the coverage obligations on operators that were licensees of two blocks. This obligation fell on Telefónica, Vodafone and Orange, which are bound to jointly provide 30 Mbps broadband to municipalities with less than 5000 inhabitants.
...
The study has shown that LTE technology is the most cost-effective solution for 75% to 98.5% of population, since it is not expected that VDSL technology covers that region. In addition, satellite broadband is recommended to cover the last 1.5% of population.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by CRCulver on Friday July 24 2015, @06:50PM

    by CRCulver (4390) on Friday July 24 2015, @06:50PM (#213270) Homepage

    Yes. When you're in an economic catastrophe caused by socialist economic policies

    Spanish rural areas have faced dire economic prospects for pretty much forever, including under a long 20th-century regime so anti-socialist that it began by executing many thousands of socialists. Certain developments in the overall Spanish economy might be fairly blamed on policies by socialist parties, but it's hard to blame socialism for every miserable Extremaduran or Andalusian town or village were broadband might be laid out.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday July 24 2015, @08:28PM

    That's fair. Not everyone's problems are caused by socialism. My booty call bailing on me this weekend had nothing to do with either socialism or capitalism, for instance.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 25 2015, @12:00AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 25 2015, @12:00AM (#213385)

    "Socialist" should be in quotes there.

    It should be noted that State Capitalism (linked in my comment above) is generally accepted as a stepping stone to a true Socialist society.
    The thing is that not a single national gov't which has called itself "Socialist" or "Communist" has ever made it beyond the State Capitalism stage.
    Someone always gets greedy for power.

    Don't go blaming Socialism for the failures of Capitalism--no matter what form that Capitalism takes.

    -- gewg_