[A] report noted that the chip is expected to remain viable for at least 16 years once implanted.
While the "target" population is poor, third-world women, such technology is, of course, ripe for abuse. After all, think about it: If that demographic is the primary target, why would the chips need to be encrypted? How many third-world populations have within their midst the technological capability or the power to resist?
When he began Microsoft, Bill Gates likely never thought he'd become rich enough to hold the power of life in his hands. Talk about your "evil corporations."
The sourced article says that the encryption is meant to prevent hackers or cybercriminals from accessing the device. Robert Langer says the chips could hit the market in 2018.
Additionally: This amazing remote-controlled contraceptive microchip you implant under your skin is the future of medicine [Washington Post] (July 17, 2014)
(Score: 2) by ikanreed on Friday July 24 2015, @07:03PM
My guess is handling the actual keys is too technical for the average user, and that there will be some account accessible by both medical professionals and the owner that can control them.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Friday July 24 2015, @07:35PM
It would kinda suck to lose the keys.
Surgically remove implant or brute force it.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]