Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Friday July 24 2015, @06:15PM   Printer-friendly
from the next-level-sterilization dept.

[A] report noted that the chip is expected to remain viable for at least 16 years once implanted.

While the "target" population is poor, third-world women, such technology is, of course, ripe for abuse. After all, think about it: If that demographic is the primary target, why would the chips need to be encrypted? How many third-world populations have within their midst the technological capability or the power to resist?

When he began Microsoft, Bill Gates likely never thought he'd become rich enough to hold the power of life in his hands. Talk about your "evil corporations."

The sourced article says that the encryption is meant to prevent hackers or cybercriminals from accessing the device. Robert Langer says the chips could hit the market in 2018.

Additionally: This amazing remote-controlled contraceptive microchip you implant under your skin is the future of medicine [Washington Post] (July 17, 2014)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by aristarchus on Friday July 24 2015, @07:29PM

    by aristarchus (2645) on Friday July 24 2015, @07:29PM (#213295) Journal

    Author begs the question of who holds the encryption keys.

    Learn to use the phrase "begs the question" properly! http://begthequestion.info/ [begthequestion.info] Doing so will amaze your friends and confound your enemies, and help you to not appear semi-literate,

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by DeathMonkey on Saturday July 25 2015, @01:19AM

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Saturday July 25 2015, @01:19AM (#213398) Journal

    Learn to use the phrase "begs the question" properly!
     
    Thanks junior, but I used it properly.
     
    From your guide: When one begs the question, the initial assumption of a statement is treated as already proven without any logic to show why the statement is true in the first place.
     
    FTS:
     
      When he began Microsoft, Bill Gates likely never thought he'd become rich enough to hold the power of life in his hands. Talk about your "evil corporations."
     
    No logic-less assumptions of truth in that statement, for sure...

    • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Saturday July 25 2015, @07:08AM

      by aristarchus (2645) on Saturday July 25 2015, @07:08AM (#213439) Journal

      You do not seems to understand the difference between "raises the question" (which seems to be what you meant) and "begs the question", which would not really raise any questions at all, but only re-assert the original proposition. Are you logically or grammatically impaired? There are on-line groups that can help with that, or you could just take logic course at your local community college! For the win!

      • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Saturday July 25 2015, @02:42PM

        by DeathMonkey (1380) on Saturday July 25 2015, @02:42PM (#213488) Journal

        When did you lose the ability to identify begging the question?

        • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Saturday July 25 2015, @09:24PM

          by aristarchus (2645) on Saturday July 25 2015, @09:24PM (#213641) Journal

          This does raise the question of whether or not the whole grammatical intervention my be something of a damp squid for all intensive purposes. Or maybe you are lack toast and tolerant? (do a quick search for "eggcorns".)