[A] report noted that the chip is expected to remain viable for at least 16 years once implanted.
While the "target" population is poor, third-world women, such technology is, of course, ripe for abuse. After all, think about it: If that demographic is the primary target, why would the chips need to be encrypted? How many third-world populations have within their midst the technological capability or the power to resist?
When he began Microsoft, Bill Gates likely never thought he'd become rich enough to hold the power of life in his hands. Talk about your "evil corporations."
The sourced article says that the encryption is meant to prevent hackers or cybercriminals from accessing the device. Robert Langer says the chips could hit the market in 2018.
Additionally: This amazing remote-controlled contraceptive microchip you implant under your skin is the future of medicine [Washington Post] (July 17, 2014)
(Score: 1) by patella.whack on Sunday July 26 2015, @12:18AM
You want child support? I want the chip records.
This might add an interesting legal twist to cases where a woman gets pregnant while falsely maintaining to her partner that she is on birth control. Did she switch off her chip, intending to get pregnant? I wonder how the courts would weigh this against a DNA test that shows paternity.