Der Spiegel [in German], supported by Sky News [in English], report:
[translation mine]Ever since young people started earning money playing computer games, a discussion has arisen within Gamer circles: is E-sport, professional computer game playing, really sport? Is mouse-clicking and button pressing at high tempo easier, more challenging, or just as sophisticated as kicking a ball or swimming faster than others?
To put it plainly, whoever games professionally needs exactly as much training, passion, and talent as professionals in classical sports. And that good gamers compete in front of tens of thousands of spectators makes the world hardly better or worse than a football/soccer world championship or the Tour de France.
In any event Gamers may have to think about the issue more than they'd like. The E-Sports League (ESL), in which players of games like "Counter-Strike: Global Offensive," "Fifa," and "League of Legends" compete, has announced that they will be cooperating with the National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA). It is supposed to not only prevent doping, but institute concrete testing. ESL has announced that the Counter-Strike competition on August 22-23 in Cologne's Lanxess Arena that skin tests will be conducted.
Additional reporting here and here.
(Score: 2) by fliptop on Sunday July 26 2015, @12:00PM
Some friends and I once had a discussion on whether racing and cheerleading were sports. We came to this conclusion: If racing is a sport, the vehicle is the athlete. As for cheerleading, we concluded that any "sport" where winning and losing is determined solely on scoring by judges is an exhibition and not a sport. But what about boxing and MMA you ask? We concluded they are sports because you have the opportunity to knock out your opponent.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.