While only a small percentage of drivers say they would be completely comfortable in a driverless car, a sizable amount would have no problem as long as they retain some control, according to a University of Michigan report.
Researchers Brandon Schoettle and Michael Sivak of the U-M Transportation Research Institute examined motorists' preferences for vehicle automation, including their overall concern about riding in self-driving cars.
They surveyed 505 licensed drivers and found about 44 percent prefer to retain full control while driving. Nearly 16 percent would rather ride in a completely self-driving vehicle, while almost 41 percent said they prefer a partially self-driving vehicle with only occasional control by the driver.
Male drivers and drivers under 45 are more likely to favor partially or completely self-driving vehicles, the researchers say.
"Self-driving vehicles are often discussed in regard to their potential safety, energy-consumption and environmental benefits, or the existing technical challenges that must be overcome for their successful implementation," Schoettle said. "However, less attention has been paid to considering the actual level of automation, if any, that drivers desire in their vehicle."
While about two-thirds of those surveyed said they are at least moderately concerned about riding in completely self-driving vehicles, that percentage drops to less than half for partially self-driving cars. Women and those 45 and older are more apt to have concerns with either level of automation. According to the U-M report, nearly all respondents (96 percent) would want to have a steering wheel and gas and brake pedals available in completely self-driving vehicles.
As for partially self-driving vehicles, 59 percent of those surveyed said they prefer a combination of three warning modes (sound, visual, vibration) to notify drivers when to take control of the vehicle. About 19 percent thought that sound and visuals would be enough.
Schoettle and Sivak defined the three levels of automation as:
(Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Sunday July 26 2015, @12:40PM
Aaah, the Dunning-Kruger effect in action
It would be extremely to difficult to truly disprove this assertion to a stranger. I could say the Dunning-Kruger effect applies just as easily to a grand majority of college graduates, because it is easy to make assertions.
But unless you think that everyone is equal in all ways, there are, in fact, going to be some people who are better at some things than others. What those things are, who those people are, and to what degree they are better varies. This is the problem with screaming "Dunning-Kruger" in every possible situation.
Not smart enough or hard working enough to be a graduate
What makes you think so? Furthermore, what makes you think that most colleges have good enough standards to the point where getting a degree would be overly difficult for someone who is truly intelligent and talented? And what makes you think that college graduates are inherently superior? What makes you think that person is not a college graduate? Perhaps they were just talking about *most* college graduates, and they are also a college graduate.
Too many assumptions on your part.