SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The Washington Post reports that an internet escort in Charleston, W.Va., may have saved her own life and the lives of many other women, when she shot and killed an alleged attacker who showed up at the woman's home on July 18 after answering an escort ad she had placed on Backpage.com. Neal Falls showed up with multiple pairs of handcuffs and a Subaru full of weapons and tools, including a shovel, knives, a bulletproof vest, a machete, bleach, trash bags, sledgehammers and axes. In Falls's pocket, police said, was a list of names of potential future victims, all of whom are sex workers who advertised on Backpage. Investigators are trying to determine whether Falls is responsible for a string of slayings targeting sex workers in Ohio and Nevada. "We are entering his DNA profile into CODIS, which is a national crime DNA database, to see if it matches any previous submissions from anywhere in the United States," says Steve Cooper, the Charleston Police Department's chief of detectives. "If his DNA has been located in any other crimes and his profile was entered into CODIS, there will be a match."
From the moment Falls showed up at the home of his latest alleged victim, he turned violent. "I knew he was there to kill me," says the victim who asked not to be identified. Falls pulled a gun on her and began strangling her. "When he strangled me he just wouldn't let me get any air. I grabbed my rake and when he laid the gun down to get the rake out of my hands, I shot him. I just grabbed the gun and shot behind me." Local authorities are treating the shooting as an act of self-defense. According to Cooper, "when we find multiple sets of handcuffs, a machete, an axe, a bulletproof vest and container of bleach, the first thing that comes to an investigator's mind is, 'This is a serial killer kit.'"
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Monday July 27 2015, @04:56AM
Interesting statistics. I hope you don't believe that those statistics "just happened". The whole "war on drugs", and the tactic of targeting the drugs favored by black people were designed with that specific goal in mind.
And, I'll note that gun laws are designed to achieve the same kind of goal. Criminalize ownership and common practices and activities that gunowners enjoy. Get them on a trumped up gun charge, so as to deprive them of the vote. It has worked so well with blacks, that it has been turned around against gunowmers - mostly "redneck" gunowners. I'm certain that most people have noticed that the well-to-do still have guns, even in the most draconian jurisdictions. The mayor of New York has a battallion of armed officers ready to defend his life - but he won't permit the man in the street to have a weapon.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 27 2015, @05:25AM
Do you have any proof of that? There's multiple sources of drug laws being intentionally designed to be racist, from Nixon's mouth [suburra.com] and DEA agents told not to enforce drug laws [thefreethoughtproject.com] in white neighborhoods. Where is similar evidence that gun laws are intended to be solely as a method to destroy exclusively black lives?
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Monday July 27 2015, @05:37AM
I invite you to do a search - gun laws are indeed racist, and the earliest gun laws in what would become the United States targeted black people specifically. http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/racist-roots-of-ga-gun-laws.pdf [georgiacarry.org] Just enter the search term into your favorite search engine: "gun laws are racist" then browse the results.
However, I did not mean to imply that current gun laws are racist, rather I meant that GUN OWNERS are being targeted. Mass brain-washing propaganda from the liberal media, coupled with draconian laws, and draconian sentences for minor "offenses" are intended to disenfranchise gun owners. That goal is only racist insofar as some gun owners are black.
These "concealed weapon" laws, for instance. It is generally foolish to carry your valuables in plain sight, and that applies to weapons as well as jewelry and money. Can you imagine a law that makes you a criminal for concealing your other valuables? Tucking ten $100 bills into your wallet where a pickpocket can't readily see them would be against the law. Instead, you would have to carry those hundred dollar bills taped to your shirt front.
It is just as insane to prosecute a person for carrying a concealed weapon. Likewise, it is equally insane to prosecute another person for OPENLY carrying a weapon.
(Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 27 2015, @05:52AM
You're right, I absolutely should search for all the evidence that proves your position right [yourlogicalfallacyis.com]! What kind of crazy got into my head, thinking that you should be the one supporting your own position? Silly me.
So when you said that they were designed with the same goal in mind - to disenfranchise minorities, specifically blacks - you meant something totally different? Oh, ok. Sorry, I got confused there, I thought you meant what you said instead of something totally different. It was so obvious that you meant something other than what you said, I don't know how I missed it. My bad.
(Score: 2) by gnuman on Monday July 27 2015, @04:43PM
Interesting statistics. I hope you don't believe that those statistics "just happened". The whole "war on drugs", and the tactic of targeting the drugs favored by black people
Well, I would not say that. I would say that "war on drugs" targets *poor* people. Poor people are the street-dealers - they are the ones that are most likely to get caught and prosecuted over drugs. Blacks are just more likely to be poor for various reasons.
turned around against gunowmers - mostly "redneck" gunowners. I'm certain that most people have noticed that the well-to-do still have guns ...
Ideally, no one should own guns. Not the people. Not the police. Guns cause more problems than they solve. Guns are tools people use to escalate confrontations that otherwise would not have escalated. They provide false sense of security. False sense of empowerment. Look at the UK, where police did not have guns. Now, they had reported 1 death over 2 year period from gun shot wound. Something like 50 people were killed by police (guns, beatings, etc.) since 1900.
http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Documents/research_stats/Deaths_Report2012-13.pdf [ipcc.gov.uk]
Meanwhile, in the US, it's close to 700 police shooting deaths this year and we are not even half-way through,
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2015/jun/01/the-counted-police-killings-us-database# [theguardian.com]
So what is going on here? Why is nation of guns so unsafe? Is there no drug dealers in UK? No hooligans?
Seriously, gun death rates are higher in some US neighborhoods than in insurgency Baghdad with car bombs and everything. "If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail" - the same applies to guns.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Monday July 27 2015, @09:16PM
You and I are going to have to disagree on that. I think that every responsible adult should own a weapon or two. Further, every responsible adult should carry his weapon with him when he goes to court - it helps to keep the cops and the judge honest.