Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Monday July 27 2015, @03:59AM   Printer-friendly
from the backpage-bada$$ dept.

The Washington Post reports that an internet escort in Charleston, W.Va., may have saved her own life and the lives of many other women, when she shot and killed an alleged attacker who showed up at the woman's home on July 18 after answering an escort ad she had placed on Backpage.com. Neal Falls showed up with multiple pairs of handcuffs and a Subaru full of weapons and tools, including a shovel, knives, a bulletproof vest, a machete, bleach, trash bags, sledgehammers and axes. In Falls's pocket, police said, was a list of names of potential future victims, all of whom are sex workers who advertised on Backpage. Investigators are trying to determine whether Falls is responsible for a string of slayings targeting sex workers in Ohio and Nevada. "We are entering his DNA profile into CODIS, which is a national crime DNA database, to see if it matches any previous submissions from anywhere in the United States," says Steve Cooper, the Charleston Police Department's chief of detectives. "If his DNA has been located in any other crimes and his profile was entered into CODIS, there will be a match."

From the moment Falls showed up at the home of his latest alleged victim, he turned violent. "I knew he was there to kill me," says the victim who asked not to be identified. Falls pulled a gun on her and began strangling her. "When he strangled me he just wouldn't let me get any air. I grabbed my rake and when he laid the gun down to get the rake out of my hands, I shot him. I just grabbed the gun and shot behind me." Local authorities are treating the shooting as an act of self-defense. According to Cooper, "when we find multiple sets of handcuffs, a machete, an axe, a bulletproof vest and container of bleach, the first thing that comes to an investigator's mind is, 'This is a serial killer kit.'"


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 27 2015, @07:21AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 27 2015, @07:21AM (#214158)

    > Interesting . . . I wouldn't expect that.

    Frankly your demonstrated understanding of human psychology is very poor in general. I used to be like you when I was a teenager and then I started to wonder why the fuck I was so frequently wrong about people. It was a real blow to the ego to realize people who did things I didn't understand were not actually stupid, that in fact I was the stupid one for assuming their motivations fit into the simplistic boxes of my worldview.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 27 2015, @09:05AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 27 2015, @09:05AM (#214190)

    "It was a real blow to the ego to realize people who did things I didn't understand were not actually stupid"

    I don't smoke, drink, or dfo drugs. I don't understand and have never understood why anyone would do anything both so costly and self destructive. Please explain.

    • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 27 2015, @09:46AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 27 2015, @09:46AM (#214199)

      They do it because it feels good. Pretty simple no?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 27 2015, @03:05PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 27 2015, @03:05PM (#214342)

      I can't tell if you are Poe's Lawing or not.
      Life is not binary. Substance abuse is not the same as recreational use.

    • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 27 2015, @04:46PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 27 2015, @04:46PM (#214397)

      I don't smoke, drink, or dfo drugs. I don't understand and have never understood why anyone would do anything both so costly and self destructive.

      Lots of possible reasons:
      1. They're not as destructive/self-destructive as the government claims. Prohibition, on the other hand, is far more destructive to individuals and society as a whole.
      2. They're not as dangerous as the government claims
      3. Because its illegal. Fuck the man, rebel against society!
      4. They're fun
      5. To see the world and your problems from different perspectives
      6. Spirituality
      7. Therapy/mental health; MDMA is ideal for this [maps.org]
      8. Experimentation, including "The government and my parents lied to me about weed, so I bet they're lying about crack and heroin too. Lets see what those are like."
      9. Social lubrication
      10. Escapism
      11. Physical dependence or addiction

      And that's just off the top of my head. There's lots more reasons, and everyone has their own.

  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Monday July 27 2015, @01:18PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday July 27 2015, @01:18PM (#214288) Journal

    Frankly your demonstrated understanding of human psychology is very poor in general. I used to be like you when I was a teenager and then I started to wonder why the fuck I was so frequently wrong about people. It was a real blow to the ego to realize people who did things I didn't understand were not actually stupid, that in fact I was the stupid one for assuming their motivations fit into the simplistic boxes of my worldview.

    I don't see that you are in a position by your own admission to make such a judgment or that such a judgment is warranted in this case. When someone puts up a legal/social framework or system, we don't automatically expect to understand all the ways it can possibly be gamed. I don't consider the previous discussion to be poor understanding of human psychology. Now, Runaway may have written elsewhere of things that indicate some degree of ignorance of human nature, but I don't think that has happened here.

    Further, to veer back towards the main topic, it's worth noting here that no one has actually demonstrated that making prostitution illegal helps with human trafficking. They have shown (and I might be a bit generous here) the lesser claim that making prostitution legal doesn't completely eliminate human trafficking or dysfunctional relationships which I doubt was Runaway's expectation despite what was written.

    • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 27 2015, @02:53PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 27 2015, @02:53PM (#214337)

      I don't see that you are in a position by your own admission to make such a judgment or that such a judgment is warranted in this case. When someone puts up a legal/social framework or system, we don't automatically expect to understand all the ways it can possibly be gamed.

      That you think it has anything to do with being "gamed" suggests you suffer from the poor analytical ability as runaway. Based on your posting history that is unsurprising you two are fellow travelers.

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday July 28 2015, @12:20AM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday July 28 2015, @12:20AM (#214615) Journal

        That you think it has anything to do with being "gamed" suggests you suffer from the poor analytical ability as runaway.

        No, "gamed" is merely an obvious term with respect to discussing intentional systems. When someone figures out how to exploit for benefit a contrived system in a way which was not intended, then it is "gamed". That is all. Given that one of the justifications for legalizing prostitution is to reduce human trafficking, then any behavior, cunning or not, which both runs counter to the intent and amply benefits the person exhibiting the behavior, is gaming of the system.