SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The Washington Post reports that an internet escort in Charleston, W.Va., may have saved her own life and the lives of many other women, when she shot and killed an alleged attacker who showed up at the woman's home on July 18 after answering an escort ad she had placed on Backpage.com. Neal Falls showed up with multiple pairs of handcuffs and a Subaru full of weapons and tools, including a shovel, knives, a bulletproof vest, a machete, bleach, trash bags, sledgehammers and axes. In Falls's pocket, police said, was a list of names of potential future victims, all of whom are sex workers who advertised on Backpage. Investigators are trying to determine whether Falls is responsible for a string of slayings targeting sex workers in Ohio and Nevada. "We are entering his DNA profile into CODIS, which is a national crime DNA database, to see if it matches any previous submissions from anywhere in the United States," says Steve Cooper, the Charleston Police Department's chief of detectives. "If his DNA has been located in any other crimes and his profile was entered into CODIS, there will be a match."
From the moment Falls showed up at the home of his latest alleged victim, he turned violent. "I knew he was there to kill me," says the victim who asked not to be identified. Falls pulled a gun on her and began strangling her. "When he strangled me he just wouldn't let me get any air. I grabbed my rake and when he laid the gun down to get the rake out of my hands, I shot him. I just grabbed the gun and shot behind me." Local authorities are treating the shooting as an act of self-defense. According to Cooper, "when we find multiple sets of handcuffs, a machete, an axe, a bulletproof vest and container of bleach, the first thing that comes to an investigator's mind is, 'This is a serial killer kit.'"
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 28 2015, @02:50AM
> The solution is imperfect so it doesn't count?
Where is there proof that it was a solution at all?
> Hyperbole such as:
Yes. That is the exact phrase I was referring to.
> The minutiae argument wins yet again.
It is so weird that you can say that and actually mean it. Its like you are a computer or something. If there is a syntax error that negates the entire meaning of the argument.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 28 2015, @03:37AM
Its called "harm reduction". It'll happen no matter what, and there's nothing we can do to stop it, so we should try to make it as safe as possible for the workers. See this [harmreduction.org] page and just replace "drug use" with "prostitution".
And your argument that it hasn't completely eliminated sex-worker trafficking is the nirvana fallacy [logicallyfallacious.com]. The goal is not to eliminate it completely but significantly reduce its occurrence and harms.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday July 28 2015, @02:02PM
Where is there proof that it was a solution at all?
I treat it as a solution hence circularly it is. Now, I think what you're really asking is if it is a solution that works. I don't know. We never got that far until now.