SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
To bring order to low-altitude airspace so its Project Wing delivery drones can get off the ground, Google is proposing a set of rules for operating aircraft below 500 feet. The proposal calls for all drones, including those flown by hobbyists, to constantly transmit identification and position information so airspace access and collision avoidance can be managed by computer.
The proposal, unveiled on Wednesday by Dave Vos, head of the Wing project, seeks to take moment-to-moment control of airspace under 500 feet away from air traffic control authorities and put it in the hands of private airspace service providers, he said. These companies, which he called ASPs, would receive data from all craft in flight, including hobbyist drones, emergency helicopters and commercial craft like those being developed by Google Wing. Before every flight, each craft would send a short flight plan. The flight might be approved as requested, approved with modifications to take into account other users, or denied.
[...] Right now, use of this low-altitude airspace is largely unregulated and hobbyists are able to fly without having to identify themselves, their vehicles or detailed flight plans. That’s one reason the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) only allows drone flight within visual line of sight. But if Google, Amazon and other companies are to use drones for package delivery and other services, the line-of-sight restriction will need to be lifted.
[...] Vos is proposing the system be based as much as possible around technology that already exists, to reduce development and standardization time. That means drones and aircraft would use ADS-B, an aviation industry standard used on many airliners that sends out position, heading, speed and identification data every few seconds. All large planes already have ADS-B transponders, but with entry-level equipment starting at around $2,000, many smaller aircraft do not. Earlier this year, Google said it had started development of an “ultra low-cost” ADS-B transponder that will be cheap enough that every operator will be able to afford it. “If you can’t afford it, you can’t afford to fly, in my opinion,” he said. “That means we need to make sure everyone can afford it.”
(Score: 3, Interesting) by c0lo on Friday July 31 2015, @09:53AM
No sky-diving either without a per-approved detailed free fall/landing plan, Google can't be held liable if a drone collide or tangles your parachute cords.
We shall examine bungee-jumping later.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 31 2015, @10:51AM
Well, I'm sure you'll be able to buy Google-approved parachutes that communicate their current position so that Google's drones can avoid you. Any other parachute will, of course, be forbidden, for safety reasons. Don't complain about the price; that extra technology costs! What? Privacy? Do you have something to hide? Are you a criminal? You know, criminals may use parachutes for smuggling, therefore it's necessary that all parachute uses are recorded. Also, if something goes wrong, wouldn't you like the ambulance to quickly find you?
Oh, and BTW, jumping is only to be done from Google planes. The parachute's DRM will ensure that using it to jump from non-Google planes will not work. No, it will be your fault if it fails because you're trying to jump from another plane; after all, it was written clearly in the safety instructions that this parachute is only to be used to jump from Google planes.
(Score: 2) by iwoloschin on Friday July 31 2015, @01:20PM
What about the birds?
(Score: 2) by Joe Desertrat on Friday July 31 2015, @05:43PM
Hence forward, it is forbidden to fly a low tech kite or release helium balloons, Google's business would be under threat.
Reading about the little that gets leaked out about the TPP, this sort of thing might be law in the near future.