Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Sunday August 02 2015, @06:31AM   Printer-friendly
from the say-it-isn't-so dept.

Danny Crichton writes at TechCrunch that startups in Silicon Valley run on an alchemy of ignorance and amnesia and that lying is a requisite and daily part of being a founder, the grease that keeps the startup flywheel running. Most startups fail. The vast, vast majority of startup employees will never exercise their options, let alone become millionaires while doing it. But founders have little choice as they sell their company to everyone, whether investors, employees, potential employees, or clients. "Founders have to tell the lie – that everything is fine, that a feature is going to launch even though the engineer for that feature hasn't been hired yet, that payroll will run even though the VC dollars are still nowhere on the horizon," writes Crichton. "For one of the most hyper-rational populations in the world, Silicon Valley runs off a myth about startup success, of the lowly founder conquering the world."

Crichton says that Silicon Valley needs a new transparent approach toward information, but also need to understand that startups are inherently risky – and accept the lies that come with them. Founders can't expect to hide the term sheets and their liquidation preferences from employees who ask and informed employees have a right to know what they are getting into. "We still need that Big Lie to function. We still need to dream about the possibility of success in order to realize it," concludes Crichton. "With greater transparency comes a responsibility on the part of everyone in the startup ecosystem to understand and empathize with the plight of founders trying to build their companies."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Gearloose on Sunday August 02 2015, @10:55AM

    by Gearloose (336) on Sunday August 02 2015, @10:55AM (#216977)

    Under pure capitalism, the only possible way to survive is to make something people want. Like it or not, people seem to really want social networks, uber and aibnb.

    States and governments are the one trying to shove things down our throats that we don't really want but have to accept anyway (e.g. war!). They try to force us to use taxis even though we voted for Uber with our wallets. Under capitalism, money is money. Under statism, you are a peon and should do what you're told.

    Of course most startups will fail. What they are trying to do is very hard (make something people want). Nobody ever created a reliable recipe for this. You just have to take the risk. Founders know this and investors know this. Only peons are surprised.

  • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 02 2015, @11:24AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 02 2015, @11:24AM (#216979)

    A lot of people really, really want war! for the very same reason that they really want social networks: to fit in with the moronic crowd. There is no draft, buddy. How else do explain why so many stupid, stupid, stupid asshole scum volunteered for war! when there are wars! on? People don't even have to be told what to do when peer pressure is so very effective to persuade stupid shits.

    • (Score: 1) by Gearloose on Sunday August 02 2015, @01:26PM

      by Gearloose (336) on Sunday August 02 2015, @01:26PM (#217000)

      That is a good point.

      • (Score: 2) by zafiro17 on Sunday August 02 2015, @05:52PM

        by zafiro17 (234) on Sunday August 02 2015, @05:52PM (#217047) Homepage

        Don't forget, there's an enormous industrial-military complex that wants war too, not for idealistic reasons but because it puts dinner on the table. If you're trained military sitting around in lovely, gorgeous peace, your job is at risk and your skills are of no value. But if unspecific threats lurk around every corner (let's call it something like 'schmerrorism'), you can not only stay employed but potentially drum up lots of new opportunities and get paid for them. What's the saying? "If you can't be part of the solution, there's excellent money to be made in prolonging the problem." Same goes for the industrial interests that make easy money selling tanks and aircraft and bullets and stealth goggles, and so on. The same goes for the research interests that support development of new technologies. It is all business, and it's important. Yeah, there are some doofuses out there that get seduced by the idea of fighting for God and country and virginal blondes under threat of bearded extremist lunatics (and God bless them, I'm not here to cast aspersions on our troops). But sometimes the guys beating the drums of war are beating them with stacks of invoices they'd like you to sign ...

        --
        Dad always thought laughter was the best medicine, which I guess is why several of us died of tuberculosis - Jack Handey
  • (Score: 2) by FakeBeldin on Sunday August 02 2015, @07:31PM

    by FakeBeldin (3360) on Sunday August 02 2015, @07:31PM (#217074) Journal

    Under pure capitalism, the only possible way to survive is to make something people want.

    Another way to survive is to make people want something.
    As old Bill would say: Aye, there's the rub!