Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday August 02 2015, @05:29PM   Printer-friendly
from the no-easy-ride dept.

Having looked in the last few days at the problems of insurance and Uber drivers, the City of Toronto will file the paperwork to take another legal crack atshutting down Uber, but it hasn't decided whether it will actually follow through. The previous attempt failed. Lawyer Matthew Cornett confirmed Friday the city will serve a notice of appeal Tuesday to challenge Judge Sean Dunphy's Superior Court ruling.

"This will preserve our right to appeal (within the 30 day-limit)," Cornett said.

Last month, Dunphy denied the city's application for an injunction against the ridesharing company, ruling Uber isn't operating a taxi cab or limousine service. A lawyer for the city had argued Uber should fall under the same licensing requirements that govern taxi brokerages because "if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then you should call it a duck." Dunphy disagreed.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bziman on Monday August 03 2015, @02:24AM

    by bziman (3577) on Monday August 03 2015, @02:24AM (#217192)

    The judge probably thinks that taxi license racket is obsolete, and found a technical reading of the law that let him rule in a way that makes sense. You can't claim that the justice system is ever actually about justice - not in the USA and probably not in Canada, either. At least this time, it's to the benefit of the public.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2