Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday August 02 2015, @05:29PM   Printer-friendly
from the no-easy-ride dept.

Having looked in the last few days at the problems of insurance and Uber drivers, the City of Toronto will file the paperwork to take another legal crack atshutting down Uber, but it hasn't decided whether it will actually follow through. The previous attempt failed. Lawyer Matthew Cornett confirmed Friday the city will serve a notice of appeal Tuesday to challenge Judge Sean Dunphy's Superior Court ruling.

"This will preserve our right to appeal (within the 30 day-limit)," Cornett said.

Last month, Dunphy denied the city's application for an injunction against the ridesharing company, ruling Uber isn't operating a taxi cab or limousine service. A lawyer for the city had argued Uber should fall under the same licensing requirements that govern taxi brokerages because "if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then you should call it a duck." Dunphy disagreed.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Nerdfest on Monday August 03 2015, @04:54PM

    by Nerdfest (80) on Monday August 03 2015, @04:54PM (#217465)

    Oh, I agree, hence "technicalities" being quoted. The same technique is used to charge people who are innocent of what most would consider the intent of the law, although much less frequently. I still think a lot of it could be made much more clear by cleaning up the way laws are written.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2