Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 9 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Monday August 03 2015, @08:43AM   Printer-friendly
from the nonplussed dept.

A sigh of relief has been heard across the Internet as behemoth Google has finally relented in it's ever intruding necessity to have a Google+ account from every service and function from signing up for Gmail to posting comments on YouTube.

From Slate to The Verge and everywhere in between there is dancing in the streets as Google finally got the message... no, not today Google, I don't want Plus. Plus will not be going away, it will become it's own property, left to stand on it's own, and unhooked from every Google service under the sun.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Pino P on Monday August 03 2015, @07:02PM

    by Pino P (4721) on Monday August 03 2015, @07:02PM (#217506) Journal

    In order for a site to let users log in with their Twitter credentials, the site's operator has to have a Twitter account in order to register the site with Twitter. The same is true of Google and Facebook.

  • (Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Tuesday August 04 2015, @12:52AM

    by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Tuesday August 04 2015, @12:52AM (#217674)

    That's essentially creating a single point of failure, which is foolish. It's more foolish when you realize how terrible most people's passwords are, even for more important things. I wish web developers would get a clue and actually learn how to develop a website like they're supposed to know how to do rather than relying on all sorts of third party nonsense from privacy-violating companies. For most websites, I see RequestPolicy block 10+ third party sites, with the worst ones having over 20. Not just advertisers, either. It's absolutely ridiculous.

    • (Score: 1) by Pino P on Wednesday August 05 2015, @11:43PM

      by Pino P (4721) on Wednesday August 05 2015, @11:43PM (#218849) Journal

      You appear to claim that protocols such as OpenID Connect are "foolish". But in an era of registration confirmation e-mails routinely getting mistakenly eaten by spam filters, what is supposed to uniquely identify a user account and allow for resetting a forgotten password?

      • (Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Thursday August 06 2015, @04:02AM

        by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Thursday August 06 2015, @04:02AM (#218943)

        But in an era of registration confirmation e-mails routinely getting mistakenly eaten by spam filters, what is supposed to uniquely identify a user account and allow for resetting a forgotten password?

        Check what was identified as spam yourself. If that's too hard for a significant amount of your users, then you should rethink your target userbase.

        In general, I recommend relying less on third party websites. Especially don't rely on the likes of companies like Google, Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft, etc. All this nonsense does is allow for more cross-site tracking and gives attackers access to more of the user's accounts if they manage to break in. All for convenience.

        • (Score: 1) by Pino P on Thursday August 13 2015, @01:39AM

          by Pino P (4721) on Thursday August 13 2015, @01:39AM (#222056) Journal

          Anyone who breaks into your Google account or Microsoft account can already read your Gmail or your Hotmail and request password resets.