Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Monday August 03 2015, @06:27PM   Printer-friendly
from the blunt-assessment dept.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is struggling to hire computer scientists, according to a Department of Justice audit of the feeb's attempts to implement its Next Generation Cyber Initiative.

A 34-page audit report (PDF) from the DoJ notes that, while making considerable progress, the FBI has "encountered challenges in attracting external participants to its established Cyber Task Forces".

[The audit] bemoaned how hiring and retaining qualified white hats remained a challenge for the FBI, especially when competing private-sector entities pay more and have less invasive recruitment processes. The FBI reportedly did not hire 52 of the 134 computer scientists for which it was authorised, meaning 38 per cent of the workforce it requires (as per budget) is simply not there. This additionally means that five of the FBI's 56 field offices do not have even a single computer scientist assigned to their Cyber Task Force.

Back in 2011, the Office of the Inspector General gave the FBI a thorough scolding over its inability to address America's cyber-intrusion threat, for which it has become the responsible national body. The Next Generation Cyber Initiative was launched in response, essentially as a platform for funding increases in the face of a swelling number of data breaches and cyber-attacks in recent years.

This is not the first mention of the FBI's difficulties in recruiting infosec professionals. Last year, the [FBI]'s director James Comey said the company was re-examining its drugs policy as too many applicants seemed to be enjoying a doobie en route to interview.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 04 2015, @10:12AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 04 2015, @10:12AM (#217854)

    Take it as an indicator; it will not be the only obviously irrational cargo cult corp management decision you will encounter there. I guess if you just want to "just work there", it's fine, but I don't see that kind of firm being competent and I don't anymore want to work for a dysfunctional company.

    Heck, I'd be much more concerned about the quantity of idiots and abusive sociopaths in workforce than the number of recreational drug users and this policy generates a net increase of people belonging to either of the former two groups.

    (reasoning and its premises: if you get to choose where to work for, being dishonest in interview is idiotic unless you are a sociopath. abstaining solely to produce a clean sample is dishonest. the pool of people who are in such position is not unimportant. the negative effect of this "only liars in" filtering far outweighs any intended correlation-based positive effect)