Temperatures are set based on formulas that aimed to optimize employees' thermal comfort, a neutral condition of the body when it doesn't have to shiver to produce heat because it's too cold or sweat because it's too hot. It's based on four environmental factors: air temperature, radiant temperature, air velocity and humidity. And two personal factors: clothing and metabolic rate, the amount of energy required by the body to function.
The problem, according to a study in Nature Climate Change on Monday, is that metabolic rates can vary widely across humans based on a number of factors -- size, weight, age, fitness level and the type of work being done -- and today's standards are based on the assumption that every worker is, you guessed it, a man.
Or if you want to be really specific, a 40-year-old, 154-pound man.
...
Kingma and van Marken Lictenbelt's work builds on research out of Japan which found that the neutral temperature for Japanese women was 77.36 degrees (Fahrenheit) while it was 71.78 for European and North American males.
5.58 degrees is a significant difference. Is it better for half the people in the office to be sweaty than half the people in the office to be chilly?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2015, @08:08PM
Is there a way to automatically give a lower score to all comments containing the phrase "Social Justice Warrior" or the abbreviation "SJW"? Because in my experience all of them are purely worthless rants.
I really wish SJWs were not real, but they are. There is much evidence of mandatory SJW indoctrination programs in some colleges. [youtube.com] This is a real problem, and it's major scary shit considering that anyone who disagrees is labeled an idealogical extremist, and this is the precursor [allenbwest.com] to Reeducation / Internment Camps. [youtube.com] (or "fun camps" as some presidential nominees call them) [youtube.com]