Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday August 07 2015, @04:53AM   Printer-friendly
from the somewhere,-the-penny-has-dropped dept.

There can't be many printer owners who haven't had an apoplectic fit about the outrageous cost of inks for their machines, and now Epson is trying to change that business model and lower the cost of printing.

Traditionally printer manufacturers have sold their hardware at a loss and made the money back over the lifecycle of the product in consumables. Ink can cost more than expensive perfume or good single-malt Scotch, and in some cases it's cheaper to buy a new printer for $50 rather than replace all the damn cartridges. Now Epson is introducing Americans to its EcoTank printers that can hold two-year supplies of ink. A bottle of the replacement ink will cost around $13 per color, so the cost per page is drastically lower than for conventional printers.

"The introduction of EcoTank marks a fundamental shift in the way we think about using color in business and in the home," said Keith Kratzberg, VP of Epson America.

"Epson EcoTank sets a new standard for color printing, convenience, and value. We believe that our new EcoTank printers are well-positioned to take a large bite out of the small business printer market."

Epson still has to make money, of course, and will do so with a much higher upfront purchase price. The cheapest printer in the range, the Expression ET-2500 EcoTank, will set you back $379 plus tax, and the most expensive model, the WorkForce Pro WF-R4640, costs $1,200 – minus a buck.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by c0lo on Friday August 07 2015, @11:23AM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday August 07 2015, @11:23AM (#219511) Journal
    What's wrong with laser printers? They are cheap for quite some times - I paid about $120 for a Samsung ML2010 some... let me see... 7 or 8 years ago.
    Mmmm... seems like you can find colour ones now dirt cheap (AUD65 [officeworks.com.au] for example?)
    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by danomac on Friday August 07 2015, @03:29PM

    by danomac (979) on Friday August 07 2015, @03:29PM (#219597)
    A few years ago I found a HP CP1025nw on sale for $140 CAD, it was actually cheaper than black and white printers.

    I bought it and am still working on the introductory charges. Best part is (as I only print maybe a dozen times a year) I can leave it be for 10 months and OMG it still works! This one also uses foomatic drivers so it works flawlessly in linux. I will never go back to the expensive inkjets that invariably cost me $50 a page when the ink dries out.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 07 2015, @06:25PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 07 2015, @06:25PM (#219649)

    > What's wrong with laser printers?

    The best color laser printer has the photo quality of an average inkjet. If you don't care so much about printing pictures, or documents with embedded pictures, then laser is the way to go.