There can't be many printer owners who haven't had an apoplectic fit about the outrageous cost of inks for their machines, and now Epson is trying to change that business model and lower the cost of printing.
Traditionally printer manufacturers have sold their hardware at a loss and made the money back over the lifecycle of the product in consumables. Ink can cost more than expensive perfume or good single-malt Scotch, and in some cases it's cheaper to buy a new printer for $50 rather than replace all the damn cartridges. Now Epson is introducing Americans to its EcoTank printers that can hold two-year supplies of ink. A bottle of the replacement ink will cost around $13 per color, so the cost per page is drastically lower than for conventional printers.
"The introduction of EcoTank marks a fundamental shift in the way we think about using color in business and in the home," said Keith Kratzberg, VP of Epson America.
"Epson EcoTank sets a new standard for color printing, convenience, and value. We believe that our new EcoTank printers are well-positioned to take a large bite out of the small business printer market."
Epson still has to make money, of course, and will do so with a much higher upfront purchase price. The cheapest printer in the range, the Expression ET-2500 EcoTank, will set you back $379 plus tax, and the most expensive model, the WorkForce Pro WF-R4640, costs $1,200 – minus a buck.
(Score: 2) by theluggage on Friday August 07 2015, @11:41AM
The worst thing about inkjet printers is that if you let them go unused for a few weeks the ink dries up and clogs the nozzles.
AFAIK Epson cartridges have always been "ink tanks" rather than cartridge/head assemblies.
Its a while since I've had an Epson inkjet, but when I did, they used permanent piezo-electric heads built in to the printer rather than the disposable HP/Canon thermal 'bubblejet' heads that were part of the cartridge.
So this isn't such a big technological change for Epson (there are/were unofficial kits to add external ink tanks to Epson printers).