Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday August 07 2015, @07:44PM   Printer-friendly
from the blue-lightsaber-to-the-rescue dept.

Blue LEDs, once confined to the world of digital displays and Blu-ray players, have just found a new calling: food preservation. New research at the National University of Singapore shows the potential of using blue LEDs as a chemical-free method to kill bacteria that lead to spoilage.

Earlier this year, public concern about artificial preservatives pushed fast-food restaurants like McDonald's, Subway, and Panera to seriously rethink the ways they keep their food fresh. Using blue LEDs could potentially kill the same bacteria that preservatives do without any of the scary, outrage-rousing chemicals.

The researchers looked at the effect of blue LED exposure on three of the major colonies of bugs that cause food to rot and stomachs to turn: Listeria, E. coli, and Salmonella. Their paper, published in the journal Food Microbiology, showed that the blue lights succeeded in inactivating the bacteria, with even better results in cold temperatures and acidic conditions. Foods like fresh-cut fruit, chilled meats, and ready-to-eat seafood, like sushi and lox, could all someday benefit from the pathogen-killing lights.

https://www.inverse.com/article/5154-blue-leds-are-the-future-of-food-preservation


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 07 2015, @09:33PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 07 2015, @09:33PM (#219699)

    Generally there isn't bacteria in the center of solid pieces of meat, thus why you only need to sear the outside of tuna. The center being raw isn't as much of a problem as mass media make it out to be.

    Anything even slightly processed, like all grocery store ham, will have had injections at some point. That is where the worry of internal bacteria is legitimate.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +3  
       Informative=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Saturday August 08 2015, @12:05AM

    by frojack (1554) on Saturday August 08 2015, @12:05AM (#219722) Journal

    Not to mention the ground beef problem. !!

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 2) by kurenai.tsubasa on Saturday August 08 2015, @04:40PM

      by kurenai.tsubasa (5227) on Saturday August 08 2015, @04:40PM (#219912) Journal

      I prefer bison myself. At any rate, would you care to elaborate? Is it due to the grinding process itself or using wooden cutting boards? (hoping I didn't just *woosh*!)

      • (Score: 2) by frojack on Saturday August 08 2015, @09:00PM

        by frojack (1554) on Saturday August 08 2015, @09:00PM (#219990) Journal

        Massively more surface area in ground beef.
        A chunk of steak need only have the outside illuminated by the led or UV lights. But ground meat has that outside layer distributed throughout the entire bulk of the meat. One marginal chunk of meat in the hopper can contaminate 50 pounds of ground round.

        And that contamination can be so deeply embedded in the tray of hamburger that no led/UV light can get to it.

        --
        No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
  • (Score: 2) by dyingtolive on Saturday August 08 2015, @04:10AM

    by dyingtolive (952) on Saturday August 08 2015, @04:10AM (#219789)

    Thank you for the enlightenment. I didn't realize, but that makes sense as I think about it.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for moose wang!