Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday August 08 2015, @11:38PM   Printer-friendly
from the nice-summer-beach-reading dept.

Raymond Chen recently posted a ten-part introduction to the ia64 architecture. Rapidly teaching me that while I might be able to write a brainfuck to perl compiler in a few minutes, there's no way in a million years that I'll ever be able to write a good compiler that targets ia64.

The Itanium is a 64-bit EPIC architecture. EPIC stands for Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing, a design in which work is offloaded from the processor to the compiler. For example, the compiler decides which operations can be safely performed in parallel and which memory fetches can be productively speculated. This relieves the processor from having to make these decisions on the fly, thereby allowing it to focus on the real work of processing.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Francis on Sunday August 09 2015, @02:17PM

    by Francis (5544) on Sunday August 09 2015, @02:17PM (#220250)

    It's not a matter of being a fanboy, there were numerous points along the way where AMD was ahead and was unable to get much benefit from it due to antitrust laws being broken by the competition.

    Bulldozer was unfortunate, but you're failing to account for how revolutionary they're goal was. I had the previous chip and it kicked the teeth out of what Intel was doing at the time. Even now, Intel depends on fixed benchmarks to keep their lower end chips looking like they're keeping up.

  • (Score: 2) by albert on Sunday August 09 2015, @04:16PM

    by albert (276) on Sunday August 09 2015, @04:16PM (#220290)

    There was no way AMD could produce enough chips. They'd have had to outsource production.