Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Sunday August 09 2015, @10:56AM   Printer-friendly
from the themightybuzzard-ain't-gonna-like-this dept.

Intensive fishing prompts much concern and debate over sustainability of fish stocks, but could it also be driving evolutionary changes that render fish of the future less catchable?

There are many examples of an evolutionary 'arms race' between predator and prey, where adaptations that help hunted animals avoid capture prompt changes in hunters that help them become more deadly.

Scientists at the University of Glasgow investigating whether commercial trawling is similarly driving evolutionary change in fish have found fitter fish are better at evading capture. They speculate that, over time, this could lead to physiological changes in future fish populations.

Dr Shaun Killen of the Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, said: "There is a lot of concern on how overfishing is affecting the abundance of wild fish, consequences for the economy, employment and the ecosystem as a whole.

"But one aspect that is often overlooked is that intense fishing pressure may cause evolutionary changes to remaining the fish that are not captured."

A study led by Dr Killen, published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, used simulated trawling with schools of wild minnows to investigate two key questions around fisheries-induced evolution.

The researchers wanted to know whether some individuals within a fish shoal were consistently more susceptible to capture by trawling than others, and if so, was susceptibility related to individual differences in swimming performance and metabolism?

The researchers measured the swimming ability, metabolic rate, and indicators of aerobic and anaerobic physical fitness of 43 individual fish. They then placed them in a tank with a trawling net in a simulation that was repeated several times, enabling the identification of individuals which were more susceptible to capture.

Dr Killen said: "Fish being trawled will try to swim at a steady pace ahead of the mouth of the net for as long as possible, but a proportion will eventually tire and fall back into the net.

"Fish that escape trawling are those that can propel themselves ahead of the net or move around the outside of the net. The key question is whether those that escape are somehow physiologically or behaviourally different than those that are captured. Most trawlers travel at the about same speed as the upper limit of the swim speed of the species they are targeting.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 09 2015, @11:54AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 09 2015, @11:54AM (#220212)

    365 days of the year.

    There will be 366 days next year, don't you know, as part of Obama's desperate attempt to reform the calendar and prolong his dwindling time in power before he becomes a lame duck for whom you voted.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Troll=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 1, Offtopic) by janrinok on Sunday August 09 2015, @12:01PM

    by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Sunday August 09 2015, @12:01PM (#220214) Journal

    You are an idiot - I'm not American, I don't vote for US Presidents.

    • (Score: 1, Offtopic) by Runaway1956 on Sunday August 09 2015, @12:13PM

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday August 09 2015, @12:13PM (#220220) Journal

      "You are an idiot - I'm not American, I don't vote for US Presidents."

      Your sig? "It's always my fault..." It doesn't matter if you voted or not, it's still your fault.

      • (Score: 1, Offtopic) by janrinok on Sunday August 09 2015, @12:34PM

        by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Sunday August 09 2015, @12:34PM (#220225) Journal
        I suppose that is correct - it is my fault that Americans vote for whom they do, but in my defence I have to say that I don't vote for them personally.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 09 2015, @12:20PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 09 2015, @12:20PM (#220221)

      Thanks for replying to the obvious troll: fact followed by insult followed by conspiracy theory supported by half truth and concluded with a personal attack. Too subtle for you, idiot?

      Seriously though, 365-days-a-year is off-by-one because the calendar has 366 days to accommodate leap years. Idiot.

      • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Sunday August 09 2015, @12:29PM

        by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Sunday August 09 2015, @12:29PM (#220223) Journal
        Only for certain years :)
      • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Sunday August 09 2015, @12:37PM

        by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Sunday August 09 2015, @12:37PM (#220227) Journal

        becomes a lame duck for whom you voted

        My objection, such as it was, is that you assumed that I voted for him, or any other candidate for that matter.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 10 2015, @10:43PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 10 2015, @10:43PM (#220953)

      Don't blame me. I voted for Kodos.